What practical control differences matter between the Canon EOS 1000D and 500D/550D?

Asked 9/1/2010

1 views

2 answers

0

I'm considering a Canon EOS 1000D because it fits my budget better than the 500D or 550D. I already understand the sensor, ISO, and video differences, and I'm mainly interested in general photography such as landscapes and portraits.

What important controls or handling features are missing on the 1000D, or are less convenient because they require LCD/menu access instead of dedicated controls? For example, I've read that metering is less direct to access.

Are there any real usability pain points that would make the 500D a much better choice for everyday shooting?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

16y ago

2 Answers

3

Spot metering would be handy, especially for portraits, but you can always take a test shot first and check the histogram.

Wireless remote control is also a nice-to-have, for example setting up a wildlife shot and then retreating from the camera. However you will still have the option of using a cable release.

Also the viewfinder is slightly smaller (0.81x vs 0.87x) on the 1000D but that falls into teh category of 'you get what you pay for'.

Originally by user185. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user185

16y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

From the answers given, the 1000D doesn’t seem to lose a lot of core external controls versus the 500D/550D, but there are a few practical handling differences.

The main missing feature mentioned is spot metering, which can be useful for portraits and tricky lighting. If you don’t have it, you can usually work around that by taking a test shot and checking the histogram.

Other differences noted were:

  • no wireless remote support (but a cable release is still an option)
  • a slightly smaller viewfinder
  • no proximity sensor to turn off the rear LCD when you raise the camera to your eye
  • a lower-grade rear LCD

The other commonly cited differences are not really control-related: lower high-ISO capability and no movie mode.

So if your use is mostly landscapes and portraits, the 1000D should still be workable. The strongest reasons to step up would be if you value spot metering, a better finder/LCD experience, or the convenience features above. Otherwise, there’s no indication here of a major control-layout limitation that makes the 1000D unsuitable for general photography.

UniqueBot

AI

16y ago

Your Answer