Canon 500D with 18-55 + 75-300, or 550D with 18-55 IS: which is the better starter kit?
Asked 2/6/2012
5 views
2 answers
0
I'm comparing two used Canon entry-level DSLR kits at about the same price:
- Canon EOS 500D with EF-S 18-55 and EF 75-300
- Canon EOS 550D with EF-S 18-55 IS
Which is the better choice for a beginner? Is the extra zoom range of the older two-lens kit worth it, or is the newer 550D body and stabilized kit lens the better option overall?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
8
You haven't given any information about how these combinations will be used, so any answers have to make some pretty sweeping assumptions about that sort of thing. With that caveat in mind, though, here are some general thoughts.
If this kit is the only set of camera equipment you're ever going to purchase, and these are your only options, I'd have to give the nod to the two-lens kit because of the range it'll cover. I hope this isn't the case for you, though, because it's not a very good kit for most use cases.
Both camera bodies are solid options. Rebels are solid entry-level DSLRs, and both the 500 and 550 have capabilities that you could grow with for years. The 18-55 is also considered a decent kit lens. While often maligned as too slow or too soft or too cheaply-built, these lenses are really very suitable for someone who's learning photography. You'll eventually learn why photographers upgrade to more expensive lenses, and you'll (hopefully) be in a position to decide if and when those upgrades makes sense for you.
The 75-300 lens, on the other hand, doesn't have as much going for it. If this was the only inexpensive telephoto choice available for Canon, it would probably be a necessary evil, but Canon also makes a 55-250 lens that's generally considered to be sharper and better-performing than the 75-300, and you should be able to find one for just a few bucks more than the 75-300. One step further up the food chain, Canon's 70-300 (not to be confused with the 75-300) is fairly well-liked, and just beyond that, the 70-200 f/4 L lens is one of the more budget-friendly "L" (pro) lens offerings.
All things being equal, if you can pick up the 550 and 18-55 IS and save toward a more solid telephoto offering, I think you'll end up happier in the long run (and if you feed us a little more info, we might be able to help even more).
Originally by user269. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user269
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
If these are the only two choices, the safer pick is the 550D with the 18-55 IS.
Why: both the 500D and 550D are capable entry-level DSLRs, and the 18-55 kit lens is generally decent. But the EF 75-300 has a poor reputation, so the extra reach of the two-lens kit doesn’t necessarily make it the better value.
Image stabilization on the 18-55 IS can also be genuinely useful for handheld shooting in lower light or at slower shutter speeds, especially for a beginner.
The main reason to choose the 500D kit would be if you specifically need longer focal lengths right away and can accept the limitations of the 75-300. Otherwise, the newer body plus the better kit lens is the more balanced option.
A reasonable alternative, if possible, would be buying a body and adding a Canon 50mm f/1.8 instead of the 75-300, depending on what you want to shoot.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which Rebel T3i kit is better for sports: 55-250mm IS or 75-300mm III?
Should I buy the Canon EF-S 55-250mm IS, or a cheap 70-300mm plus the 50mm f/1.8 for my Rebel T2i?
Which Canon telephoto zoom is the better buy on a Rebel T3i: EF-S 55-250 IS, EF 70-300 IS, or EF 75-300?
Which Canon entry-level DSLR is closest to the Nikon D3100, and should I switch systems for it?
Which is better on a Canon T3: EF 75-300mm or EF-S 55-250mm for street and nature?