Is TTL useful for off-camera flash, or will it just overfire if the light barely affects the subject?

Asked 5/27/2016

4 views

2 answers

0

I’m using a Canon 700D with a 430EX III and experimenting with off-camera flash triggered by the pop-up flash. I understand E-TTL II on-camera: the flash fires a preflash, the camera meters the result through the lens, and then sets flash power for the actual exposure.

What I’m unsure about is how useful TTL is when the flash is off-camera. For example, if I place the flash as a hair light or backlight, very little of that light may be visible to the camera during the preflash. In that case, does TTL simply keep increasing output toward full power trying to make the overall scene brighter, even though the flash position means it can’t significantly light the subject?

Does E-TTL behave differently off-camera than it does on-camera, and in what situations is off-camera TTL actually helpful?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

9

The same is true when the flash is on the camera, facing away from the subject into empty space with nothing to reflect it back to the subject.

The point of TTL is to adjust flash power automatically under the assumption that it has an influence on the scene.

If the flash is on camera or not is not too relevant. In event photography or photojournalism for example, you can sometimes see photographers holding the flash in one hand and the camera in the other. This gives more flexibility in positioning the flash. In run and gun scenarios as those mentioned, an automatic flash that helps getting the shot is more important than achieving perfect exposure.

its batteries will be wasted as it goes to full power since 99% of its light never changes the picture.

I often bounce on-camera flash into high ceilings or walls, because I want to get soft light. This also leads to high power flashes. I rarely have battery problems.

Your thought is right: all the light that does not eventually reach the sensor is wasted, but there's no simple way to increase that efficiency.

Some systems are coupled with the autofocus to determine flash settings based on subject distance, but this works only on-camera and only without tilting or rotating the head of the speedlight.

In summary: while not achieving perfect exposure for the reasons you mentioned, TTL is still useful either on or off-camera to get a good exposure automatically.

Originally by user35348. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user35348

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

TTL works basically the same on- or off-camera: it meters the preflash through the lens and sets output under the assumption that the flash can meaningfully affect what the camera sees. If the flash is aimed or placed so it has little effect on the metered scene—off-camera hair light, badly aimed bounce, etc.—TTL can indeed drive the flash to high or full power without producing the result you want.

So your assumption is broadly correct: TTL is not magic, and it can waste power when the flash’s contribution to the metered exposure is small.

That said, off-camera TTL is still useful when subject distance, position, or ambient light changes quickly, such as events or run-and-gun shooting. It helps keep exposure usable without constant manual adjustments.

For more controlled setups, manual flash is often preferable: take a test shot, set the power you want, and leave it there. If using Canon E-TTL off-camera, flash exposure compensation and group ratios can help tame a hair light or balance multiple flashes.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer