Why would a photographer intentionally make an entire image blurry?
Asked 11/29/2011
3 views
2 answers
0
I understand using blur selectively to separate a subject from the background, but what is the artistic or practical value of an image that is blurred throughout? In what situations can a fully blurred or defocused photo be useful or expressive?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
50
Shooting blurred photos can be considered opposite of black and white photography - while black and white is about hiding colors to bring out shapes and shadows, blurring helps to reveal colors by hiding shapes and shadows. An interesting subcategory is a combination of the opposites - black and white blurs - where distractions by both details and colors are hidden away to bring out larger shapes or patterns.
Blurred images could be used for several purposes, like
- to hide boring shapes that have interesting colors;
- to hide unwanted details on interesting shapes;
- to give feeling of mind-boggling motion;
- to evoke memories - colors/shapes alone can trigger some memories stronger than same image with details - because only the colors/shapes match memories of other people, not the details;
- to initiate curiosity - a blurred image and a catchy title might induce a person into taking some action, like reading accompanying article;
- to differ from the ubiquitous super-sharp photography;
- to suggest a hurried "caught moment";
- to suggest that someone is leaving (walked out of focus);
- to create some new shapes with light sources leaving stripes in the frame.
As an example, Michael Orton is a photographer who has taken lots of great blurred images. The roots of creating blurry images are, however, much older, starting with (pre-)impressionist painters like Joseph Mallord William Turner (aka "the painter of light") and Claude Monet.
Originally by user4390. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4390
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A fully blurred image can still be meaningful. Removing detail shifts attention away from literal subjects and toward color, tone, larger shapes, pattern, and movement.
Photographers may use full-image blur to:
- emphasize colors or broad forms while hiding distracting detail
- suggest motion, energy, or disorientation
- evoke memory, dreamlike feelings, mental haze, loneliness, or detachment
- turn a photo into a non-distracting background for text, graphics, or other artwork
Not all blur works the same way. Defocus blur can emphasize color fields and bokeh, while motion blur can add information about movement and direction rather than simply “losing” detail. In that sense, blur can add a different kind of visual information.
So the value of a completely blurred picture is similar to any other abstraction in photography: it removes some information to make other qualities more prominent.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can deliberately out-of-focus photos still work if the subject remains recognizable?
When is centering the subject a good choice in an environmental portrait?
How can I avoid haloing when blurring the background in Photoshop?
How can I get a blurred background with an 18-55mm kit lens?
Is it okay to use Photoshop for background blur and other photo edits?