Edited after OP added "sample" photo they like. It seems to me that second picture carries very distinct silhouette of river bank (reminds me of Big Ben tower in London) and also a lot of rhythmic on light blobs. Your image (first) is more of strokes of light with subject obscured, it is much more abstract; plus ther eseems to be a lot of motion blur, not sure you really wanted that.

The trick for you, I guess, is to find subject that will remain recognizable after defocussing. Composing so that background lights are not overwhelming subject is very important (second image have basically flat background: water and sky). As an example of similar art, see this New Yorker cover. It is very low-resolution image, but if you know the original picture, you will recognize it. This "Aha!" moment is maybe something you are looking to recreate.

There is a lot of feedback in comments. I'd like to offer some help to OP though.

Quick googling by "out of focus photography" yields a lot of images, some of which are probably to OP's liking. More importantly, some of those images definitely have "special effects", tricks that make images stand out, but also interesting subjects.

To get opinion on this platform, you should state what you wanted to achieve. Then viewers can say, whether you achieved it, or -- more importantly -- how you can change your technique to achieve that result later.

So, it might be useful to attach sample image that you like and ask something like: "how do I produce that awesome effect of ..... ?" Or you might rephrase question to be something like: "I want my pictures to have X, Y, and Z, but can't get it. Am I missing something?"

You can edit question, add others' images that you like, more precise technique-based questions. As it looks now, question is off-topic for this platform (photo@stachexchange)

PS: I would also suggest renaming your question, as it is more about "how to achieve that effect" or "tricks and tips for out-of-focus photography"