Which of these cameras is best for photographing wild birds?

Asked 4/18/2012

3 views

2 answers

0

I'm choosing between several cameras and want to photograph wild birds. My options are:

  • used Nikon D5000 with 55-200mm lens
  • Nikon Coolpix L310
  • Nikon Coolpix L810
  • Canon 600D with kit lens

I noticed the Coolpix L810 has a much longer zoom range than the DSLR kit lenses. Would that make it better for bird photography than a DSLR with a 200mm lens?

I'm also hearing that DSLRs are harder to maintain. Is that really true, and which option would make the most sense for bird photos?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

5

From a camera perspective the Nikon D5000 and Canon 600D are both perfectly usable and powerful enough for wildlife photography. However, neither one has a kit lens that would be useful for wildlife, especially birds.

As a very general rule of thumb, 300mm is the minimum for larger game, 400mm for larger birds, and you can never have enough focal length for the smaller birds. Often you'll find pros with a 600mm lens with a teleconverter to get even more length. With lenses of this length you have to start thinking of a good support structure like a good tripod with a good head.

However, there are good budget means to get adequate length for birding such as the Sigma 150-500 and 50-500 lens and the Tamron 200-500 lens. They are available for several camera manufacturers including Nikon and Canon. They give good performance for the price but they have limitations, too.

Another popular way of doing birding where you get a lot of length is with digiscoping. In this technique you use a spotting scope, which typically has more of a telescope like power, and add a camera to the end. Some rigs cost more than expensive lenses but with better focal length but some are more affordable.

Lastly, consider how much work you're willing to do for bird shots. You can get by with shorter lenses if you're willing to put in the work to use blinds and other techniques to get closer. The best birding pictures are those where the photographer has worked their way into a great position that doesn't interfere with the birds, is in good light, and a well chosen background. Also learning bird behavior is essential to good bird photography. The more you learn the more you can work around equipment limitations.

Originally by user8677. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user8677

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For bird photography, reach matters a lot. A 200mm lens is usually too short for wild birds unless you can get very close. As a rough guide, 300mm is often the minimum for larger wildlife, around 400mm for larger birds, and small birds often need even more.

So among your listed options, the superzoom compact may get you closer-looking bird shots than a DSLR with only a kit lens or 55-200mm. The tradeoff is image quality and speed: small-sensor bridge/compact cameras generally do worse in poor light and are less suitable for fast action such as birds in flight.

If you want the best long-term route for serious bird photography, the DSLR bodies (Nikon D5000 or Canon 600D) are more capable, but they really need a much longer lens than the ones included. The body matters less than having enough focal length.

On maintenance: DSLRs are not dramatically harder to maintain. Store them somewhere dry and dust-free, and keep lenses clean with a microfiber cloth. That said, interchangeable-lens cameras can collect dust on the sensor over time.

Bottom line: for casual bird photos, the long-zoom compact is more practical; for better quality and more serious wildlife work, choose a DSLR and budget for a longer telephoto lens.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer