RAW vs JPEG: what do you gain with RAW, and what are the downsides?
Asked 7/15/2010
2 views
2 answers
0
I know RAW files take much more storage than JPEGs. What practical advantages does RAW give you when shooting, and aside from file size, what are the trade-offs or downsides compared with JPEG?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
16y ago
2 Answers
41
I expect pro-RAW answers will dominate here, so I'll offer a pro-JPEG view.
I was shooting RAW from the start when I started using digital cameras. However, after a few years, when looking into my workflow, I realize that I very rarely use what RAW offers (post exposure white balance changes, exposure corrections and so on). My typical adjustments to the image is a slight increase of contrast, and perhaps adjust brightness a bit (yes, I try to be thorough with white balance and exposure when shooting). Given that, I really could not justify my image using 3-4 times the storage space required by RAW, so a year and a half ago I stopped shooting RAW out of habit, and instead default to JPEG.
It still happens that I switch to RAW, if the subject is of a nature where I expect to need extra post processing (tricky high-contrast light situations for instance), but more than 99% of my images are JPEG in the camera, and I have not yet felt that it limits me.
Originally by user10. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user10
16y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
RAW keeps more image data than JPEG, especially higher color/tonal depth, so it gives you much more flexibility in post-processing. That makes it easier to adjust white balance, exposure, contrast, and recover highlights/shadows with less image degradation than editing a JPEG.
JPEG’s main advantage is convenience: smaller files, faster capture/write times, easier sharing, and a simpler workflow because the camera has already processed the image.
Main RAW downsides:
- much larger files
- more storage required
- potentially slower burst/capture performance
- more complicated workflow, since RAW usually needs processing before sharing or printing
Main JPEG downsides:
- less color/tonal information
- less room for correction after the shot
- repeated or heavy editing degrades quality more quickly
- the image is more “finalized” by the camera’s processing
In practice, RAW is most useful when you expect to do meaningful editing or want maximum latitude from the file. If your exposure and white balance are usually right in-camera and you prefer speed and simplicity, JPEG can be a perfectly sensible default.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI16y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why shoot RAW and JPEG at the same time?
Are there drawbacks or compatibility issues with using LZW-compressed TIFFs for editing and archiving?
Is shooting RAW worthwhile if I only edit in iPhoto or other simple tools?
What’s the practical difference between Canon in-camera JPEGs and JPEGs exported from Lightroom from the same RAW file?
What’s the difference between spherical and aspherical lens elements?