What’s the difference between spherical and aspherical lens elements?
Asked 4/12/2011
6 views
2 answers
0
I often see lenses advertised as having “aspherical elements.” Does that mean most ordinary lens elements are spherical? What does an aspherical surface change in practice, and what are the advantages or trade-offs compared with spherical lens elements?
Originally by user4700. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4700
15y ago
2 Answers
17
It is simple and relatively cheap to make lenses whose surfaces are parts of a plane or parts of a sphere. Such lenses do not focus light perfectly; this lack of focus is spherical aberration. This graphic from a Wikipedia article schematically illustrates how the light rays fail to converge (lower half) compared to a hypothetical perfect lens (upper half).

Spherical aberration is especially prominent in large, fast (bright) lenses. This lack of focus shows up as various forms of fuzziness. The problem can be corrected by placing other lenses in front of and behind the lens. It can also be corrected by changing the shape of the lens surfaces (making them aspherical), but that tends to be more difficult and expensive to carry out: glass spherical shapes are simple to make and measure; aspherical ones are not.
When additional lens elements are added as correction, they increase the amount of flare and reduce the contrast of the photograph, as well as adding to the size and weight of the lens. They might also alter the colors a little. Therefore, aspherical elements typically signal a lens that is crafted to produce contrasty, colorful images and to be lighter and easier to use. They do not in themselves assure high quality, because lenses can exhibit other problems besides spherical aberration. For instance, small aspherical lenses can be molded of plastic and routinely appear in cheap photo equipment. However, a large glass aspherical lens is much more expensive to produce and usually reserved for better lenses.
Originally by user1356. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1356
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—most traditional lens surfaces are spherical, meaning each curved surface is part of a sphere. Spherical surfaces are relatively simple and inexpensive to manufacture, but they don’t focus all incoming light perfectly to the same point, which causes spherical aberration. This is often more noticeable in fast lenses used wide open.
An aspherical element has at least one surface that is not part of a simple sphere. That gives lens designers more freedom to correct aberrations, especially spherical aberration, and can help improve sharpness or allow a lens to use fewer elements for similar correction.
In practice, a lens described as “aspherical” usually has only one or a few aspherical surfaces; the rest of the lens is still made of spherical or flat elements.
The trade-off is manufacturing complexity and cost: aspherical surfaces are harder to make accurately. Also, optical design is always a compromise—improving one aberration can sometimes affect other rendering characteristics, such as bokeh.
So the main advantage of aspherical elements is better correction of optical flaws with more design flexibility; the main downside is greater complexity and expense.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How do aspherical lens elements affect image quality compared with spherical designs?
Why do aspherical lens elements cost more to make?
RAW vs JPEG: what do you gain with RAW, and what are the downsides?
What is hybrid autofocus, and how does it compare with contrast-detect and phase-detect AF?
What does USM mean on Canon lenses, and what are the pros and cons?