For shallow-depth-of-field portraits, should I use AF-S or continuous AF?
Asked 12/9/2015
5 views
2 answers
0
When shooting portraits with very shallow depth of field, even small movements by the subject or photographer can shift focus off the eyes. Is continuous autofocus a better choice than single-shot autofocus for keeping the eyes sharp, or is AF-S still preferable?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
4
With a depth of field of 3 cm/1+ inch, there isn't much room for error. Since you say you're shooting a portrait I'll assume this is a portrait of a person and not a static subject. (If it were a static subject, though, I would tell you to lock the camera down on a tripod!) But, on the topic of a portrait: what kind of results are you after? With a DOF of 3 cm you are able to get your subjects nose in focus. DOF won't reach to their eyes or ears.
But, ignoring specific depth of field for a moment and trying to better answer the question of continuous or single AF mode: yes, continuous mode can be very helpful in achieving focus lock when using shallow depth of field. Most specifically, look at sports photography: shooters are after slim DOF to highlight one or a few players and the players are often moving fast. Continuous AF is often a good way to follow them to get an in-focus shot (or, more correctly, continuous AF is an important part of following them to get an in-focus shot).
There's more than one way to create the shallow depth of field that is often associated with portraits, however. We most typically talk about using a large aperture to do it, but another thing to consider is subject-distance relationships: the farther away the background, the more out of focus it will be. Depending upon lens focal length and aperture, f5.6 or f8 can create the effect of a shallow DOF if the background is far enough away. Likely helpful reading: What exactly determines depth of field?
Originally by user8473. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user8473
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For a moving person at very shallow depth of field, continuous AF can help because it keeps updating focus as the subject shifts slightly. That’s why continuous AF is commonly used when precise focus must be maintained on subjects that may move.
That said, with extremely thin depth of field, the margin for error can be so small that neither mode guarantees perfect results. If focus is critically hard to hold, the practical fix is often to use a bit more depth of field rather than relying entirely on AF tracking.
So the short answer is:
- Use continuous AF if the subject is moving and you need the camera to keep adjusting focus.
- Use AF-S if the subject is truly still.
- If you’re missing focus often, stop down a little for more usable depth of field.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I get tack-sharp shallow-DOF portraits when no AF point is on the eye?
In portraits, should both eyes be in focus or is one eye acceptable?
Can I select multiple autofocus points to keep both eyes and nose sharp on a Canon EOS 550D?
How can I get precise eye focus in self-portraits with a wide aperture?
Does continuous autofocus consider depth of field before refocusing?