Do I still need location keywords if I geotag photos in Lightroom?

Asked 7/29/2012

2 views

2 answers

0

I used to add place names as keywords so I could find photos by location. Now that Lightroom offers geotagging and reverse geocoding, I’m wondering whether GPS/location metadata is enough on its own. Is there still a good reason to keep using normal location keywords as well?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

2

For your own purposes, the geolocation features might serve well to help you "locate" your photos. Consider export, however... if you're sharing those photos elsewhere and that venue doesn't have a geolocation search, folks might be searching for keywords.

Let's say you have a bunch of great images of your city and you put them online... if folks search for your city by keyword, will they find them?

Originally by user89. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user89

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Geotagging may be enough for your own catalog if your software can search location metadata well. But location keywords can still be useful, especially when you export or share images to other sites or apps.

The main reason: not every service supports geolocation-based searching, while many do support keyword searches. If someone searches for a city or place name as a keyword, your images may be easier to find if that location is also stored in keywords.

So geocoding is great for organizing and mapping, but keywords can improve portability and discoverability outside Lightroom. A practical approach is to rely on geotagging for precise location data and keep location keywords when you want broader compatibility or searchable place names.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer