Are cheap third-party wireless remotes for Canon's N3 port worth buying?
Asked 8/13/2010
3 views
2 answers
0
I use a Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II, which has the N3 remote connector, and I’m looking for a non-infrared wireless remote. Some low-cost third-party options are much cheaper than Canon-branded or major-retailer alternatives, and some claim to offer both wireless and wired operation. What are the practical pros and cons of these inexpensive third-party wireless remotes for Canon N3 cameras? Are there any common trade-offs in reliability, build quality, lag, or features compared with more expensive options?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
16y ago
2 Answers
1
I can't address the Meritline remote but I use the Phottix Cleon II (http://www.phottix.com/wireless-remotes/phottixr-cleon-ii.html) with my Nikon D300 and I have no complaints.
It's my first non-IR wireless remote so I don't have anything to compare it to.
Phottix make versions for most of the popular cameras. I think the Vivitar unit at B&H is a rebranded Cleon.
The Cleon II includes a wired option but it's not very long.
Originally by user1043. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1043
16y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—cheap third-party wireless remotes can work well, but the trade-offs are usually build quality, consistency, and sometimes response lag.
From user experience shared here, third-party units such as Phottix, Hähnel, and Pixel can be perfectly usable on pro Canon/Nikon bodies. Some include both wireless and wired operation, and higher-feature models may add timer, bulb, delay, and interval shooting functions.
The main downside versus first-party gear is quality control and ruggedness. One user reported needing a minor adjustment to get a reliable connector fit, and another noted slightly more lag than with Canon’s own remote. These issues may be acceptable for casual use but are worth considering if you need absolute reliability for professional work.
So the practical summary is:
- pros: much lower cost, often good functionality, sometimes wired + wireless in one kit
- cons: less robust construction, possible connector/fit issues, possible extra lag, less confidence for critical jobs
If wired backup and advanced timing features matter, some third-party models offer those and may be a better value than the simplest cheap remotes.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI16y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which remote controls are compatible with the Canon EOS 60D?
What inexpensive wireless remote options work well with the Nikon D300s?
Can the Canon RA-E3 remote adapter be bought separately, and does it work with any E3-equipped body?
Are third-party or wireless remote shutter releases safe to use with a Panasonic GF1?
Which remote shutter release works with the Canon EOS 5D Mark III?