Would a Canon 7D with a 400mm lens be a noticeable upgrade over a Panasonic FZ1000 for birds in flight?
Asked 5/10/2018
4 views
2 answers
0
I currently shoot birds in flight with a Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 and like the results, but I want more subject size and detail on distant birds. I'm considering a used Canon EOS 7D with either the Canon 400mm f/5.6 or an older 100-400mm zoom, and I mostly shoot handheld. Would this setup give me a meaningful improvement for bird-in-flight photography, and how would the effective reach compare to the FZ1000? I'm also worried that using a 400mm prime might make it harder to acquire birds in the viewfinder quickly.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
5
The Canon EOS 7D Mark II and Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM lens combination is cost-effective pairing for birds in flight photography. The lens is light, sharp and works very well with the EOS 7D Mark II's Autofocus system.
In reasonably good light the camera / lens performs very well and bird detail is relatively sharp. I use the Camera / Lens in Manual Mode at aperture f/5.6 most of the time. Shutter speeds are mostly 1/3200s and 1/4000s.
Herewith a few Birds in Flight Photography example images with the Canon EOS 7D Mark II and Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Lens
Go>> https://www.vernonchalmers.photography/2019/01/canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-birds-in-flight.html
Attached image of a Yellow-billed duck in full flight (Woodbridge Island / Cape Town):
Regards, Vernon Chalmers
Originally by user82774. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user82774
7y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—many bird photographers consider a Canon 7D-series body with the EF 400mm f/5.6L a strong, cost-effective birds-in-flight setup. The 400mm f/5.6 is widely regarded as light, very sharp, and well suited to fast AF tracking in good light.
However, your FZ1000 already gives a similar angle of view at the long end: its built-in lens is about 432mm full-frame equivalent, while a 400mm lens on Canon APS-C gives a narrower field of view (about 640mm equivalent). So you would gain more framing reach, and likely better AF/lens performance, but not a dramatic jump in “zoom” compared with the numbers printed on the cameras.
The 100-400mm zoom is more flexible, but the older version is generally not considered as strong optically or for AF as the 400mm f/5.6 prime. Image stabilization helps with camera shake, but for birds in flight you’ll often be using very fast shutter speeds anyway.
Your concern about finding birds with a 400mm prime is valid, but it improves a lot with practice. Many photographers train on larger, predictable birds like ducks or gulls to build the muscle memory needed to get on target quickly.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which upgrade matters more for birds in flight: a longer lens or a better camera body?
Will a Nikon D500 with a 200-400mm lens give me sharper bird photos than a Nikon P900?
Is phase-detect autofocus much better than contrast-detect for bird photography?
Which is better for birds in flight on a Canon 7D: Sigma 150-500mm or Sigma 50-500mm?
Canon 100-400mm L IS vs Canon 400mm f/5.6L for bird photography on a 7D
