Why would you use f/2.8 on a wide-angle lens?
Asked 2/22/2014
4 views
2 answers
0
If wide-angle lenses are often used for landscapes or group photos where you want lots of depth of field, what is the benefit of a fast aperture like f/2.8 on a lens such as a 14-24mm f/2.8? In what situations would shooting a wide-angle lens at f/2.8 make sense, and when would f/8 still be the better choice?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
2
The most common use case for large apertures on a wide angle lens is in low light, especially wide angle views of the night sky. Because of the Earth's rotation and the apparent motion of the sky, shutter speeds need to be limited to about 600 seconds/(focal length in millimeters x crop factor). Higher ISO settings and the resultant lower exposure values tend to generate noise that is just as bright as many dimmer stars, and thus any applied noise reduction can also "eat" stars. Since depth of field is not an issue with celestial objects that are at infinity focus, wider apertures allow lower ISO settings than would be the case with typical apertures used for landscape scenes.
In general, even when shooting landscape scenes in low light the preferred method is to use a tripod that allows for longer exposures of static scenes. Even if there are elements moving in and out of the scene using narrower apertures and the resulting longer shutter speeds allow any unwanted elements that move fairly quickly through the scene to not show up in a long exposure.
When shooting large groups with wide angle lenses the narrower aperture is also usually desired to insure that everyone in the photo from front to back is in focus. If the group is fairly equidistant from the camera and the background is "busy" a narrower aperture can be used to separate the background from the subjects but care must be taken that focus is accurate and the depth of field is centered on the group.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A fast aperture on a wide-angle lens is mainly useful when you need more light or want less depth of field than usual.
For landscapes and group shots, f/8 is often preferred because it gives greater depth of field and helps keep more of the scene sharp. So in those cases, yes, f/8 is commonly the better choice.
But f/2.8 is still valuable for several reasons:
- Low light: it lets in more light, allowing faster shutter speeds or lower ISO.
- Night sky / astrophotography: stars are effectively at infinity, so shallow depth of field is not a problem, and the wider aperture helps avoid high ISO and excessive noise.
- Subject separation: even on a wide lens, if you focus close to a subject, f/2.8 can blur the background more and make the subject stand out.
- Action / sports: in dim light, the wider aperture helps reach fast shutter speeds.
So yes, it can be reasonable to shoot landscapes or groups at f/2.8 in special situations, but for typical scenes where you want everything sharp, photographers usually stop down.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should you use a wide aperture for landscape photography?
What should I look for in a wide-angle lens for Nikon DX, and is a 24mm prime worth it over the kit lens?
How do I compare wide-angle lenses on full frame, and when would I choose 14mm, 24mm f/1.4, or 24mm f/2.8?
How can I make wide-angle landscape photos look more interesting when I’m used to fast 50mm portraits?
Why would a serious photographer choose a lens slower than f/2.8?