How do I compare wide-angle lenses on full frame, and when would I choose 14mm, 24mm f/1.4, or 24mm f/2.8?

Asked 2/25/2015

6 views

2 answers

0

I’m new to photography and trying to understand how to compare wide-angle lenses for a full-frame camera. For example, what are the meaningful practical differences between an ultra-wide lens like a 14mm f/2.8 and a 24mm f/1.4? How much does the aperture difference between f/1.4 and f/2.8 matter in real use? And compared with a cheaper 24mm f/2.8, what should I be looking at besides price? More generally, what factors matter most when choosing a wide-angle lens, and in what situations would I choose one lens over another?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

6

When looking for a wide angle lens you should consider a few very important things:

  • Focal length
  • Image Quality
  • Maximum Aperture
  • Focus modes (AF/MF)
  • Filter compatibility
  • Feature set (FTM, IS, USM, etc.)
  • Mount
  • Weight, size, cost, etc.
  • Intended usage
  • Distortion & Projection
  • Flare resistance

Most of the above is not uniquely important to wide angle lenses, but the items in bold I would suggest are of particular interest to wide angle lenses.

Focal Length

Focal length is of utmost importance when considering a wide angle lens. If you want to shoot indoors and you can't simply back up your body, you may require a 17mm lens for a shot. Yes you can stitch images together if desired or necessary but you may want to buy the focal length that best fits your desired output to begin with(See: Do you still need an ultra wide angle if you can now stitch images?). There are many online visualization tools to determine what an image looks like at various focal lengths, I would encourage you to check them out first - but ultimately the best way to determine the right focal length is with some first hand experience using them. Finally, as you go wider distortion will certainly bear its ugly head. More expensive designs will help the situation but it is safe to say that wider lenses will typically experience more distortion. See this question for more information: How much does 1 mm get you in a wide-angle lens?

Aperture

The practical difference between f/2.8 and f/1.4 is for most situations identical with a wide angle lens as with any other focal length. The advantage of f/1.4 vs f/2.8 is that you will be able to shoot in significantly darker situations, or in the same situation with either a faster shutter speed or lower ISO value. It also gives you greater control over depth of field and the ability to create shallow depth of field images even at wide focal lengths. These are very wide apertures for any wide angle lens. Most wide angle lenses are actually quite a bit more narrow in the aperture area. See this question for more information on why: Why do wide angle prime lenses have relatively small apertures?

Filters

Filters are somewhat unique to wide angle lenses as some very wide lenses(especially fisheye) do not have the ability to use screen on filters. If you want to use filters(ND, Polarizer, etc.) you have to take this into consideration. You may have to either buy a new filter system or not use one at all depending on what you desire. Further you have to consider the impact of using a polarizer with a wide angle, as it can produce poor results.

Overall

Overall, the two lenses that you described are most importantly different because of their focal lengths. I personally would not be using them for the same types of shots as the field of view is so different. If you demand very wide apertures(astrophography, portraits indoor, etc.) you may also benefit from the wider aperture but that is a personal decision.

Additional Resources:

Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4892

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The biggest difference is focal length: 14mm is ultra-wide, while 24mm is wide but much less extreme. On full frame, 14mm gives a dramatically wider view, which helps in tight interiors or when you can’t step back, but it also tends to emphasize perspective and can show more distortion.

Aperture matters too. An f/1.4 lens lets in much more light than f/2.8, which helps in low light and can allow faster shutter speeds. It can also give shallower depth of field, though wide-angle lenses often still show plenty in focus unless you’re very close to the subject.

When comparing lenses, look at:

  • focal length
  • image quality
  • maximum aperture
  • distortion/projection
  • flare resistance
  • autofocus/manual focus features
  • filter compatibility
  • image stabilization and other features
  • size, weight, and cost
  • your intended use

A cheaper 24mm f/2.8 may still be a very good choice if you don’t need the extra speed of f/1.4 or premium build/features. For landscapes, many photographers stop down anyway, so the fastest aperture may matter less. Choose based on the field of view you need first, then aperture, distortion handling, and features.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer