Why does one zoo animal photo look much better than another, and what matters most: camera, lens, or editing?
Asked 9/7/2019
4 views
2 answers
0
I compared two animal photos: a gorilla photo I took and a leopard photo taken by another photographer. Both were shot on APS-C cameras (Canon 750D vs Nikon D5600), so I’m wondering what most likely made the bigger difference in image quality and impact.
My gorilla photo was taken at 300mm, f/5.6, ISO 800, 1/640s, handheld, using a Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD. I often use manual focus because the lens autofocus is slow. My editing was fairly simple: crop, reduced exposure, increased contrast, lowered highlights, added clarity, dehaze, saturation, vignette, and a radial darkening around the subject.
My goal is to make zoo animal photos look more natural and dramatic, almost as if they were taken in the wild. From these examples, what are the biggest factors that make the stronger image work better: lighting/subject separation, composition, lens quality/depth of field, or post-processing?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
6y ago
2 Answers
27
Short answer because there are many good explanations already:
- The brightest part of your picture is the background.
- The brightest part of the second picture is the subject.
Originally by user68162. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user68162
6y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The biggest difference is probably not the camera body. Two APS-C cameras like these won’t create a dramatic gap by themselves.
What stands out most is subject emphasis: in the stronger photo, the animal is the brightest, clearest part of the frame, while in yours the brighter background pulls attention away from the gorilla. Composition also helps a lot: the leopard image includes the full subject more intentionally, with background elements and depth of field supporting it rather than competing with it.
Lens and focus can matter too. A better lens, cleaner rendering, and reliable focus can improve sharpness and subject separation, especially for animal portraits.
Post-processing is also part of the look. The leopard image likely benefits from more controlled tonal shaping and color grading: lifting deep blacks a bit, avoiding over-saturation, and sharpening selectively can give a more cinematic result.
So the priority order is roughly: lighting/subject-background separation and composition first, then lens/focus performance, then editing. To improve your results, try to place the animal against a darker or less distracting background, keep the whole subject or a deliberate crop, expose so the subject is the visual focus, and use restrained color and contrast adjustments.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI6y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Will switching from Canon APS-C to full frame reduce my effective reach at 300mm?
Best budget telephoto lens for a Canon 600D for wildlife and nature
Do all 300mm lenses give the same reach, and what does “f/4-5.6 IS USM” mean?
Why can EXIF show 302mm on a 70–300mm lens?
Why isn’t my Nikon D4 tracking a small animal running toward the camera?