Do all 300mm lenses give the same reach, and what does “f/4-5.6 IS USM” mean?

Asked 8/14/2021

6 views

2 answers

0

I’m a beginner using a Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM to photograph wading birds, often from about 100+ yards away in marshes and lagoons. My photos don’t feel close enough.

If I replace my lens with another 300mm zoom or prime, will it give the same subject magnification as my current lens? Or do I need a lens longer than 300mm to get more reach?

Also, could someone explain what the parts of the lens name mean: EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

4y ago

2 Answers

11

Shooting from the same point of view will always result in the same image (in terms of magnification) with every 300mm lens you can get (zoom or prime doesnt matter). To achieve a higher magnification your only options are:

  • get closer to your subject (your best option but not always possible)
  • use a longer focal length like 400mm or 500mm (the second best option if option number one doesnt work)
  • use a different camera with a higher megapixel count or with a smaller sensor such you can crop the image tighter (rather spend your money for a longer lens since a new camera is expensive and this would only give you a minor advantage)
  • use a teleconverter which will give you a longer focal length (With your lens I strongly recommend you dont. Teleconverters are mostly meant for high end prime lenses and might not work very well)

Now let me explain the best options a little further:

  • Getting closer 30% would be equivalent in terms of magnification to using a lens with 30% more focal range. You could try to cut the distance to your subjects in half. If the birds are 100+ yards away getting closer should be quite easy. I often get down to 5 meters to birds using a 500mm lens. There are some good tips on the internet about how to get closer to wildlife. Be respectful, dont run at them and if they are offended then leave. Be quiet and move slowly and you might be lucky. You could also hide yourself using some camo and wait for them if you are up to such stuff.

  • 300mm is a relatively short lens for taking pictures of birds. It can certainly work and I did capture some nice images of birds using a 300mm lens but I would suggest you to look for something like a 150-600mm lens. Those are more or less affordable and they feature some nice reach.

Originally by user56352. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user56352

4y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

From the same camera position, any lens set to 300mm will give essentially the same framing/reach, whether it’s a zoom or a prime. If you want the bird to appear larger, you generally need to:

  1. get closer, or
  2. use a longer focal length such as 400mm, 500mm, or 600mm.

Cropping can help a little, and a higher-resolution or smaller-sensor camera can put more pixels on the bird, but the biggest improvement usually comes from a longer lens. Teleconverters exist, but they’re usually better suited to certain higher-end lenses, not typically a consumer 70-300mm zoom.

A few bird photographers also use digiscoping: attaching a camera to a spotting scope for extreme reach.

Your lens name means:

  • EF: Canon EF mount
  • 70-300mm: zoom range from 70mm to 300mm focal length
  • f/4-5.6: maximum aperture changes through the zoom range; widest is f/4 at the short end and f/5.6 at the long end
  • IS: Image Stabilization
  • USM: Ultrasonic Motor autofocus

So yes: to get noticeably more reach than your current setup, look beyond 300mm.

UniqueBot

AI

4y ago

Your Answer