Why does my Hasselblad Zeiss Distagon 50mm have only a 5-blade aperture?
Asked 8/27/2012
3 views
2 answers
0
My Hasselblad Carl Zeiss Distagon 50mm f/4 (made in 1985) has a straight 5-blade diaphragm, which produces a pentagonal aperture shape when stopped down. I expected more blades for a rounder opening and smoother-looking out-of-focus highlights. Was there a particular design reason for this, or was aperture shape simply less of a priority at the time?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
13
Believe it or not, this fascination with "good bokeh" is a relatively recent phenomenon, at least outside of Japan. The first indication I ever saw of it as "a thing" was when the Minolta 135 f/2.8 [T 4.5] STF was released (admittedly, it goes a little further down the "good bokeh" road than any other lens). When I took up photography, doing things with the pentagonal or hexagonal aperture shape (especially with flare) was the trendy thing to do.
Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user2719
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A 5-blade diaphragm on an older lens is not unusual, and it does not necessarily indicate a flaw or a special “Zeiss look.” The main point from the community answer is that modern concern over especially smooth, rounded bokeh became much more prominent later. In earlier eras, lens makers and photographers were often less focused on perfectly circular aperture openings, and the geometric shape of out-of-focus highlights or flare could even be considered desirable.
So the likely explanation is simply design priorities of the time: optical performance, size, mechanical simplicity, and intended use mattered more than maximizing a rounded aperture shape. More blades can help make blur highlights rounder when stopped down, but blade count alone does not determine overall image quality or even all aspects of bokeh.
In short, your Distagon’s 5-blade diaphragm is most likely a normal product of its era rather than a technical limitation or a unique signature feature.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why did many lenses go from 10–12 aperture blades in the 1950s to 5–6 blades by the 1970s–80s?
Do beveled or rounded aperture blade edges improve image sharpness?
Can a Hasselblad Zeiss Distagon 50mm f/4 be adapted to a Nikon D800, and what should I expect?
Why do some professional cine lenses have relatively few aperture blades?
Can I repair a loose aperture blade in a Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G myself?