Why do some professional cine lenses have relatively few aperture blades?
Asked 11/27/2017
3 views
2 answers
0
In films and TV, out-of-focus highlights sometimes look clearly pentagonal or octagonal, even though the lenses and cameras are very high-end. Since cost usually isn’t the main issue on these productions, why would a professional cine lens use a diaphragm with relatively few blades? Is there a technical reason, and does it relate to reliability or aperture mechanism design rather than image quality alone?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A likely reason is mechanical simplicity and reliability in the iris mechanism. The aperture diaphragm is a very precise moving part, and adding more blades increases complexity, friction, and the precision needed for smooth operation. Using fewer blades can reduce those demands and make the mechanism easier to manufacture and operate consistently.
So even on expensive lenses, blade count is not only about cost or “better bokeh.” Lens designers balance many factors, including mechanical reliability, smooth actuation, durability, and overall optical design. A polygonal out-of-focus highlight shape can be a visible side effect of that design choice.
Also, whether this is a “flaw” is subjective: some shooters dislike obvious polygonal bokeh, while others accept it as part of the lens’s character.
Recommended products
Core SWX Helix Prime 190Wh Dual-Voltage Battery (Gold Mount)
$818.00
View →
3 Legged Thing QR-CINE-A Quick Release Plate for AirHed Cine-A (Arca-Swiss)
$47.99
View →
Fotodiox Pro Lens Mount Adapter - Canon EOS (EF / EF-S) D/SLR Lens to Sony E
$50.00
View →
*Opened Box* Hollyland LARK M2 DUO (Charcoal,Camera Version)
$129.00
View →
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
0
Jumping diaphragm used in AF-lenses is very critical part of lense. To make it manufacturer needs high precision and has some problems in avoiding of friction. A smaller number of blades allows to lower requirements.
Originally by user70074. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user70074
8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why does my Hasselblad Zeiss Distagon 50mm have only a 5-blade aperture?
Why do some lenses use fewer aperture blades?
Why does a zoom lens’s maximum aperture often get smaller at longer focal lengths?
Why did many lenses go from 10–12 aperture blades in the 1950s to 5–6 blades by the 1970s–80s?
Why do most DSLRs offer RAW and JPEG, but not TIFF?