Why do some modern DSLRs still use an optical anti-aliasing filter instead of fixing moiré in software?
Asked 2/7/2013
3 views
2 answers
0
I understand that an optical anti-aliasing (AA) filter slightly blurs the image to reduce moiré and aliasing. Since modern cameras have much more processing power, why is a physical AA filter still used on some DSLRs instead of handling this during demosaicing or RAW post-processing? If you can blur an image later in software, why not do that instead? Also, is a camera like the Nikon D800E basically relying on software/post-processing by cancelling out the AA effect?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
12
Aliasing is the result of repeating patterns of roughly the same frequency interfering with each other in an undesirable manner. In the case of photography, the higher frequencies of the image projected by the lens onto the sensor creates and interference pattern (moiré in this case) with the pixel grid. This interference only occurs when those frequencies are roughly the same, or when the sampling frequency of the sensor matches the wavelet frequency of the image. That is the Nyquist limit. Note...that is an analog issue...moiré occurs because of interference that occurs real-time in the real-world before the image is actually exposed.
Once the image is exposed, that interference pattern is effectively "baked in". You can use software to some degree to clean moiré patterns up in post, but it is minimally effective when compared to a physical low pass (AA) filter in front of the sensor. The loss in detail due to moiré can also be greater than that lost to an AA filter, as moiré is effectively nonsense data, where slightly blurred detail could still be useful.
An AA filter is just designed to blur those frequencies at Nyquist so they do not create any interference patterns. The reason we still need AA filters is because image sensors and lenses are still capable of resolving down to the same frequency. When sensors improve to the point where the sampling frequency of the sensor itself is consistently higher than even the best lenses at their optimal aperture, then the need for an AA filter would diminish. The lens itself would effectively handle the necessary blurring for us, and interference patterns would never emerge in the first place.
Originally by user124. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user124
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
An optical AA filter works before sampling, and that is the key point. Moiré and aliasing happen when fine scene detail approaches or exceeds the sensor’s sampling frequency (the Nyquist limit). Once the sensor has sampled that detail incorrectly, the false pattern is already recorded in the data. Software can sometimes reduce visible moiré afterward, but it generally cannot reconstruct the original detail that was lost or mis-sampled.
Blurring later is not equivalent, because post-processing only acts on already-aliased data. The optical filter slightly spreads incoming light across neighboring pixels before capture, reducing problematic high frequencies so they don’t alias as strongly.
Higher-resolution sensors reduce the need for a strong AA filter because their sampling frequency is higher, so fewer real-world subjects trigger visible moiré. That’s why some modern cameras weaken or omit the filter to gain maximum sharpness, accepting a greater risk of moiré in certain subjects.
The Nikon D800E was not recreating AA filtering in software. Its design effectively cancels the AA effect, prioritizing sharpness and leaving any moiré to be handled later if it appears.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How does the Nikon D800E cancel the anti-aliasing filter effect?
What’s the difference between the Nikon D800 and D800E, and why does the D800E cost more?
Why are more digital cameras being sold without optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filters?
Why does the Canon 5DS R use a low-pass filter cancellation design instead of having no AA filter at all?
Can you add an optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter with a lens filter?