How does the Nikon D800E cancel the anti-aliasing filter effect?

Asked 4/22/2012

5 views

2 answers

0

I’ve read that the Nikon D800E keeps the same filter stack thickness as the D800, but uses an additional optical element to cancel the blur introduced by the low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter instead of fully removing it. How does that cancellation work in practice? Is it essentially a second birefringent element oriented to recombine the image split caused by the first? Also, why not simply remove the AA filter entirely and recalibrate autofocus instead of using a cancelling filter?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

8

A traditional AA filter consists of two parts, one splits the image horizontally with a ~1 pixel offset (effectively giving one image superimposed on itself with a very small horizontal offset). Behind this is a second filter that does the same vertically. The effect of this is to split each light ray four ways so some of it lands on each of the four RGGB pixels in the Bayer array.

The D800e has the first horizontal split filter but immediately behind it a second horizontal filter which combines the two images to undo the effect of the first filter. The filter material has two refractive indices for different polarizations so each incoming ray (which will contain photons with different polarization) is split into two. If the second filter has equal and opposite refractive indices, the diverged light rays are bent the other way so the they land on top of each other again, cancelling the effect of the first filter. The key point here is that the each of the superimposed images have different polarizations, allowing them to be recombined. If this weren't the case adding a second filter would produce three images not one!

As for why they do this instead of just not installing a filter, rfusca hit the nail on the head, it's much easier (and therefore cheaper) to occasionally swap a batch of vertical filters for horizontal filters when you want to build d800es than it is to disable the filter mounting part of the production line and pass the cameras through to a different AF calibration stage.

In addition to this, modern lenses are designed to correct for the refractive properties of the filter stack. Omitting the AA filter would introduce a subtle aberration into all images shot with digital era glass.

Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1375

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A normal optical low-pass filter uses birefringent elements to split incoming light slightly in two axes, spreading detail over neighboring pixels and reducing aliasing/moiré. In simplified terms, one element shifts the image in one direction and another shifts it in the perpendicular direction.

The D800E keeps a similar optical stack, but uses a second element to counteract the first split rather than adding the usual second-axis blur. The idea is that the first element separates the ray slightly, and the next element applies an equal and opposite separation so the blur is effectively canceled while preserving the needed stack thickness.

The filter stack can’t just be removed with no replacement because it also affects the optical path length and includes other functions such as IR filtering. Changing that thickness would shift the effective sensor position optically, which affects focus. Autofocus calibration alone would not fully solve this: manual focus and even some lenses’ infinity focus behavior could be affected, and other viewfinder/focus system geometry issues would remain. Keeping the stack thickness avoids creating a substantially different camera design while reducing AA filtering.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer