Can you add an optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter with a lens filter?

Asked 10/28/2013

1 views

2 answers

0

Some cameras omit the optical low-pass filter (OLPF/AA filter) to maximize still-image sharpness, while OLPFs are often discussed as helpful for reducing moiré and aliasing in video. If a camera body does not have an OLPF built in, can a lens-mounted filter provide a similar effect? Are there products that do this, especially for video use?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

5

In cameras without an Optical Low Pass Filter (OLPF) that are becoming more common, the high resolution of the sensor often approaches or even exceeds the resolving power of many of the lenses that will potentially be used with that camera. This means the limits of the lens itself provide the benefit of reducing moire. Reduction of moire, also known as aliasing, is the whole point of putting an OLPF, also sometimes called an anti-aliasing (AA) filter, in front of the sensor.

An OLPF works by refracting the light striking it into four paths. Since theses are very tightly spaced, this has the effect of slightly blurring the image focused on the sensor just behind the OLPF. You can't detect the four different images because the size of the spread produced by the OLPF is about the same size as a single pixel well, which is the smallest unit of detection the sensor is capable of.

There are at least these problems with trying to do this from the lens.

  • The light at the front and even the back of the lens is not focused. Current OLPFs are designed to refract light that is focused.
  • Changes within the lens, such as moving focus elements or zoom elements that change the focal length, would require different spreads of the lens mounted OLPF's effect to get the desired blur of the sensor's Nyquist Frequency.
  • Interchangeable lenses must be compatible with a variety of camera models, many of which have different sensor designs from the other models that are also compatible with the same lens mount design. A filter optimized for a sensor with 4µm pixel pitch would not be useable in a camera with a 6µm pixel pitch sensor. This issue is also compounded by the way that different cameras deal with using high resolution sensors that often exceed 20MP to produce HD video, which is only about 2MP in terms of resolution. Some use down sampling, others skip pixels. Each method produces it's own flavor of aliasing.
  • Even with a fixed-focal-length fixed-focus lens, designing a filter that could achieve the desired effect for a single specific sensor design would be difficult. If such a thing could even be achieved accurately enough from the front of the lens or even attached behind the lens' rear element within the limits of today's design and manufacturing technology it would be expensive and so sensitive to changes in temperature and other environmental factors that it could only be used in a strictly controlled environment.

Most of these issues are less severe if the camera in question skips pixels to produce video at HD resolution. Since the pixel size is the same but only about every third or fourth pixel is contributing to each frame of video, the margin for error in terms of the precise amount of blur induced would be much greater. There are a few such products on the market aimed at improving the anti-aliasing performance of cameras that already have an OLPF, but they are camera (not lens) specific and tend to install in the camera's mirror box rather than attach to the lens. They usually hold the reflex mirror in the up position the entire time they are installed.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Not in the same way as a built-in sensor OLPF. A true OLPF sits directly in front of the sensor and works by splitting incoming light into multiple very closely spaced paths, creating a blur roughly on the scale of a pixel. That controlled blur reduces aliasing and moiré.

A normal front-of-lens filter is much farther from the sensor, so it cannot replicate that precise pixel-level effect consistently. In many still-photo cases, cameras without an OLPF are acceptable because sensor resolution is so high that the lens itself often becomes the limiting factor, which can already reduce moiré somewhat.

Video is different: aliasing is often caused by how the camera downsamples the sensor readout to 1080p, sometimes using line skipping. In that case, the camera’s built-in AA filter may not be enough anyway.

There have been aftermarket anti-aliasing solutions for video, including optical filters placed near the sensor path rather than ordinary front lens filters. So the idea exists, but a standard screw-on lens filter is not an equivalent substitute for a real sensor OLPF.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer