Why do camera makers use different lens mounts?
Asked 8/27/2012
2 views
2 answers
0
If a common lens mount would let brands share lenses and focus more on optics, sensors, and accessories, why do camera manufacturers use different mounts instead of one standard? Is it mainly to lock customers into a system, or are there technical and historical reasons as well?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
8
First of all, the idea that manufacturers have the incentive to facilitate the sharing of lenses is not exactly economically sound from the manufacturer point-of-view: they would rather hope that one is locked in a given system (obviously customers hope for the opposite).
Second, different mounts arise from history: there are various tradeoff to be made, different technical choices and the need to remain more or less backward compatible with one own lineup (so that you can mount any EF lens on an EOS camera, even if it was designed 30 years ago: at the same time note that, e.g., older Canon lenses do not work on EOS cameras because in 1987 a new, backward incompatible lens mount, was designed). I mention Canon because it's the one that I know better, but take thas as an example only.
As a final note, some manifacturer actually share lens mounts (witness M42 for example) or is it possible to use adapter rings to achieve compatibility to some degree (to mount a M42 lens on a Canon camera, for instance, maybe losing the autofocus capability).
PS: for an interesting take on the M42 mount, read this answer.
Originally by user5032. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user5032
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Different lens mounts exist for both business and technical reasons.
From a business standpoint, a unique mount helps keep customers in a brand’s system. Once someone owns several lenses, switching camera brands becomes expensive, so sharing mounts is not usually in a manufacturer’s interest.
But it’s not only lock-in. Mount design affects what a camera system can do: mechanical and electronic communication, autofocus design, aperture control, physical size, and how much room engineers have for future features. Different companies prioritize different design goals, so they create mounts that fit their own technology choices rather than accept another company’s compromises.
History also matters. Brands often try to maintain compatibility within their own systems, so older lenses can still work on newer bodies. Sometimes, though, a company makes a clean break to support new technology, which can create a new mount that is not backward compatible with earlier lenses.
So the short answer is: different mounts persist because they help brands differentiate their systems, preserve customer loyalty, and support each company’s own technical roadmap and legacy compatibility decisions.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why were early digital camera sensors smaller than 35mm full frame?
How many camera RAW formats are there, and is there a standard?
Why is 16:9 uncommon for professional still photography?
Why do some third-party lenses have compatibility issues on newer camera bodies?
Why do many cameras use proprietary battery packs instead of standard AA batteries?