How many camera RAW formats are there, and is there a standard?

Asked 3/10/2011

3 views

2 answers

0

Camera makers seem to use different RAW file formats. How many RAW formats are there across manufacturers, do they generally contain the same kinds of data, and is there any common standard between them?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

13

There are a lot of different RAW file formats, not compatible with each other. The Wikipedia page has a list of them. Some manufacturers have used more than one format.

There are some things they tend to have in common.

  • Most of them are based on the TIFF file format. The TIFF file format can contain various types of image data and metadata. Manufacturers tend to use the TIFF file format as a container, but include the raw sensor data inside it, rather than including a regular bitmap image. This raw sensor data can only be read by a compatible RAW image editor/viewer.

  • The raw image data includes digital readings for each active subpixel in the image sensor. Almost all modern camera sensors use the same RGGB Bayer interpolation matrix, which lays out the sub-pixels in a grid pattern where each 2x2 square of pixels has a Red, Green, Green and Blue sub-pixel. While some may read digital values using 12 bits and some may use higher bit depths, the layout is usually the same.

  • The raw data is often compressed using a common lossless compression algorithm.

  • RAW files almost always contain an embedded JPEG image as well. This allows for fast previewing of the image on the camera's LCD screen, with the ability to zoom in on detail too. In many cases, there is also a small embedded JPEG thumbnail as well.

  • RAW files need to preserve the same metadata streams as the camera would need to create the equivalent JPEG - this means that the EXIF/XMP data will also appear in the file somewhere.

The proliferation of mutually incompatible formats has led for the push to standardise, and the DNG format owned by Adobe is one attempt at creating a (comparatively) open, manufacturer-agnostic format that can be shared. However, the effectiveness of such a format is only as good as the manufacturers' support for it. Some cameras do support the DNG format directly, but they are as yet in the minority. In the meantime, open source code for reading virtually any RAW format is readily available, even though RAW files tend to include some encrypted data.

Lots more information about RAW formats is available on the Wikipedia page so I'd recommend it.

Originally by user3422. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user3422

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

There are many RAW formats, and they’re generally not interchangeable. Most major camera brands have their own format, and some manufacturers have used more than one over time.

Even though the file types differ, they usually contain similar kinds of information: the sensor’s raw image data plus metadata. In many cases, the file is based on TIFF as a container format, with the camera’s raw sensor readings stored inside rather than a normal finished bitmap image.

That raw data is typically the digital value recorded at each sensor photosite. Most modern cameras use a Bayer-pattern sensor arrangement, so RAW converters must know how to interpret that data correctly.

So, there is some common structure and purpose across RAW formats, but no single universal RAW standard that all camera makers use in the same way. That’s why software often needs specific support for each camera or RAW variant.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer