Why did a 24-exposure 35mm film roll give me 27 shots?
Asked 6/12/2022
5 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to film photography and used a Kodak M38 with Kodak UltraMax 400. The roll was labeled 24 exposures, but my camera let me take 27 shots. Is that normal, or does it mean the roll wasn’t loaded correctly and the developed film could come out blank?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
4y ago
2 Answers
4
The only difference between the 24 exposures promised on the box and the 27 exposures you were able to take is the difference between how much of the roll was pulled out of the film cannister and exposed to light during loading your Kodak M38, and thus how much of the film was still inside the film cannister when the back of the camera was closed, versus how much film needs to be pulled out of the film cannister to load other cameras like older 35mm interchangeable lens SLR cameras.
Although roll film is marketed to take a certain number of shots, roll film has no frames until it is exposed. It's just one long continuous piece of unexposed film.
The frames are created by the width of the camera's film gate. The film gate is the hole just in front of the film that determines how much of the film is exposed each time you take a photo. Only the part of the film directly behind the hole will be exposed.
The gap between each frame is determined by how far the camera advances the film before it will let you take another photo. For most "35mm" cameras which actually use 135 format film, the film gate is 36mm wide, 24mm tall, and the film advances 38mm (which is equal to exactly eight sprocket holes on the edges) for the next photo, leaving a gap of 2mm between each frame. 135 format film is actually 35mm tall (that's where the nickname "35mm" comes from), but the extra 9mm, split between the top and bottom that are above and below the 24mm height in the middle that is actually exposed, are used for the sprocket holes and for printing film type, batch information, and frame numbers by exposing just the margins when the film is manufactured.

This piece of 135 format film has already been (over) exposed and developed, then five frames were cut from a longer strip. Prints from this film would be almost totally white. If it had been developed without first having been exposed, the entire 24mm tall middle would be the same light color as the unexposed 2mm gaps between each frame, and prints from such a negative would be almost totally black.
Older 35mm cameras required more of the film be pulled from the cannister when loading. One needed enough film to insert the leader into a slot in the skinny spindle of the takeup spool. Newer 35mm cameras made near the end of the 20th Century, especially those called "compact" or "point and shoot" 35mm cameras, which usually had a lens permanently attached, often required less of the film to be pulled from the film cannister to load the film and close the back of the camera. Often the film cannister sat closer to the edge of the film gate, as did the takeup spool or takeup roller on the other side of the film gate. Instead of a takeup spool with a skinny slotted spindle in the middle, many of these "compacts" have motorized rubber rollers that apply enough pressure to the sides of the film to insure it winds onto the takeup spool or roller. Even SLR cameras with interchangeable lenses that had a motor automatically wind and rewind the film also often wasted less of the film during loading. I often got 26 and sometimes 27 frames from a "24" roll of film with my Konica FS-1 and later almost always got 27 with my EOS Rebel SII. Both were interchangeable lens film SLR cameras with motorized film advance.
At one time some film brands began marketing their "24 exposure" rolls as "24+3" or "27" rolls. In Japan some still label them as "27 exposures".
The only difference between a 24 shot roll of 135 film and a 27 shot roll of 135 is the labeling. They're the same length. It was just that the newer self winding cameras that came along in the 1980s and 1990s could get more exposures from the same film length. During the transitional period when many users still used manually wound cameras but the newer self-winders were becoming widespread such rolls were sometimes marketed as "24+3" rolls. The older traditional cameras that required spooling the leader through a slit in the middle of the takeup spool could only get 24-25 shots out of the same roll that a self-winder could get 27.
Here is where the "extra shots' come from:
"24" rolls only need 910mm± of length to fit 24 frames that are each 36mm wide plus leave 23 2mm gaps between those 24 frames. But Kodak's 135 format "24" rolls are actually 1130mm± long. The extra 220mm± length allows for the amount exposed to light that is needed during loading the film into 135 format cameras that need the most pulled out of the cannister when loading the film. It also allows for the length left between the other end of the film that is attached to the spindle inside the film cartridge and the position of the final exposure.
If I develop it, will it become a blank roll?
Once the film is developed the development can not be undone. It is chemically "fixed" during the development process. "Fixed" in this case means no longer chemically reactive to additional light. It's more or less set in stone.
If the film was never loaded into your camera properly and never advanced out of the film cannister, then none of it was exposed. But once an unexposed roll has been developed, you can't then put it back in your camera and expose it because it has been "fixed" as a blank piece of film and will no longer chemically react to light.
The fact that you got 27 frames, which is about what one would expect from a "24 exposure" roll when using a compact 35mm camera like your Kodak M38, is a pretty good clue that you did load the film correctly and that you did actually expose 27 frames before the film ran out.
Have it developed and see what you captured!
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
4y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes, it can be normal. A 35mm film roll is one continuous strip of film; the “24 exposures” on the box is an estimate based on typical loading and frame spacing, not a hard limit. Depending on your camera and how much leader was used when loading, you may get 1–3 extra frames.
So getting 27 shots from a 24-exposure roll does not by itself mean the film will be blank.
The main thing to watch for is whether the film was actually advancing correctly. If it wasn’t properly engaged with the take-up spool, you could think you were shooting while the film never moved. But if the camera seemed to load and advance normally, extra frames are usually just a bonus.
In short: develop it. Extra exposures are common with 35mm film, especially in simple compact cameras, and usually aren’t a problem.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI4y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What happens if you wind past the rated exposures on a roll of 35mm film?
Why did an entire roll from my Olympus Infinity Zoom 180 come back blank?
Can a Nikon L35AF use 36-exposure 35mm film?
Why are my outdoor shots blue on Kodak UltraMax 400, while indoor shots look normal?
Why did my Kodak UltraMax 400 negatives come out almost blank after Caffenol development?