It looks like the laboratory messed things up: the film you used is a daylight color negative film. Which means that basically, without (extra*) correction, the daylight images should have been ok, and the indoors way too orange.

But as it is a negative film, the lab can apply an extra correction for white balance (probably the reason there is no tungsten-balanced negative film).

Was the first image on the series perhaps taken indoors? In that case, the lab technician may have been lazy and applied the same correction to all images on the film, which would have made the outdoors images much too blue... I'd show this to the lab, and see what they are willing to do.

It's most certainly not the camera (film cameras simply don't do white balance correction) and the film would have shown strange colours in all prints (but see the additions below).

Note that for colour slide film such corrections are not possible, if you use a daylight film indoors, you'll have to use a correction filter.

(*: extra correction, as most color negative films have an orange filter layer that has to be corrected for as well for printing).

Edit after seeing the contact sheet: You might also have a problem with the camera shutter, the exposition looks very irregular on a lot of the images, with a visible band at the leftmost quarter. This could also explain some of the colour problems.