Why can’t an adapter add autofocus to manual or screw-drive lenses on cameras without an AF motor?
Asked 11/12/2012
6 views
2 answers
0
I’m wondering why there isn’t a simple adapter that sits between a camera body and a manual-focus or screw-drive lens to provide autofocus on bodies that lack a focus motor, such as lower-end Nikon DSLRs. In theory, could the adapter contain a motor that drives the lens using the camera’s focus signals? If not, what makes this difficult or impractical?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
9
In short, because there is no room to do that, without prohibitive cost in additional optical elements.
The lens and body are designed to provide the correct distance between the optical elements and the sensor. On a Nikon, that distance is on the order of 45mm (from memory, it can be looked up somewhere or measured on cameras with a reference mark on the body).
Inserting anything between the lens and the flange will increase that distance, and the lens will no longer be able to focus all the way to infinity.
While this can be a desirable effect for some situations (google for extension rings and follow links to learn about macro photography techniques), it makes using the lens for general shooting nearly impossible.
Note that in order to reach the screw drive head even if the motor were mounted entirely outside of the lens body, you'd still need to have several mm of working room. The practical extension ring I keep in my bag for use behind my 50mm f/1.8D is 12mm, and at that thickness the furthest focus available is at under 6 inches. 12mm isn't a whole lot of room for mechanics....
In principle, you can fix the problem of thickness with relay optics that compensate for the extra flange thickness. But each new piece of glass you put in the light path causes loss, potentially causes flare, decreases image quality, and costs money both to design and manufacture.
Check out the price on 1.7x and 2x teleconverters, which are optical systems similar to what you'd need to use, but which are solely used to extend the effective focal length of longer lenses. They not only are expensive, but the 2x converter will also steal more than a full stop of light, making autofocus harder to execute at all.
Originally by user707. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user707
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Usually because there’s no space to add that mechanism without changing the lens-to-sensor distance. A lens is designed to sit at a very specific flange distance from the sensor; if you insert an adapter, the lens sits farther away and may lose infinity focus unless the adapter includes optical elements. Those optics add cost and can reduce image quality.
There have been limited examples. Nikon’s TC-16A effectively added autofocus capability to manual lenses, but it was a teleconverter, so it increased focal length, cost a stop of light, and reduced usable focus range. That made it a niche solution rather than a general-purpose adapter.
More recently, Techart has made adapters that move certain lenses to achieve autofocus on mirrorless systems, such as M-mount lenses on Sony E-mount. These work best with unit-focusing lenses, often primes, and have practical limits.
So the idea is possible, but for DSLR systems like Nikon F it’s usually bulky, optically compromising, expensive, and limited enough that it hasn’t become a mainstream solution.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can you add a separate autofocus motor to a Nikon D3200 for older AF lenses?
Will a Dandelion chip enable focus confirmation on a Nikon D5200 with manual-focus lenses?
Will autofocus extension tubes make a Nikon D3000 autofocus with a screw-drive lens?
What are the practical differences between in-body autofocus motors and in-lens autofocus motors?
Which Nikon DSLRs have a built-in autofocus motor for older AF lenses?