Why can an 11mm fisheye and a 16mm fisheye look similar in field of view?
Asked 9/15/2023
3 views
2 answers
0
I compared a Nikon 16mm fisheye with a TTArtisan 11mm fisheye and they appeared to show almost the same angle of view. But my 11mm Irix (a rectilinear ultra-wide) makes distant subjects look much farther away.
What does focal length mean on a fisheye lens? Does it still matter, or is it mostly marketing? Why can two fisheyes with different focal lengths produce very similar-looking images?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
2y ago
2 Answers
1
A few years ago, I had a similar curiosity and this is my takeaway…which may or may not be entirely accurate.
“Fisheye” is a term of art. It does not have a concrete technical meaning.
“Fisheye” generally refers to any lens explicitly designed around a spherical projection. Any spherical projection — there are at least a few and none of them are standard within photography.
This means that focal length doesn’t correlate to field of view in the way that focal length correlates for rectilinear lenses.
However, focal length will correspond to depth of field.
But because the focal length of fisheye lenses is relatively short, depth of field is rarely a primary concern for typical photographic subjects.
They are a great creative tool and not a great technical one beyond angle of view.
Originally by user95237. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user95237
2y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Focal length still has real meaning on a fisheye lens; it is not just marketing. But fisheye lenses use a different projection than rectilinear wide-angle lenses, so the usual “shorter focal length = this exact wider look” comparison is less intuitive.
A fisheye is designed around a curved/spherical mapping, and different fisheye designs can render the same scene differently. So two fisheyes with different focal lengths can appear surprisingly similar in angle of view or subject size, especially in casual comparisons.
Also, if fisheye images are being corrected to rectilinear in-camera or in software, the correction stretches the center and crops away the outer parts of the image. That can make an 11mm fisheye end up looking closer to a 16mm fisheye after correction.
By contrast, your 11mm Irix is already rectilinear, so it preserves straight lines and gives the more familiar ultra-wide look where distant subjects seem smaller and farther away.
So: focal length on fisheyes is meaningful, but field of view and image appearance also depend heavily on the fisheye projection and on whether any distortion correction is being applied.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI2y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should I choose a fisheye or a rectilinear ultra-wide lens for architectural interiors and exteriors?
How is focal length defined for a 180° fisheye lens?
How can I shoot the nadir for a full spherical panorama with a rectilinear lens?
Why does my Panasonic 14-42mm RAW show barrel distortion in some apps, and is it a rectilinear lens or a fisheye?
Does a 1.8mm lens with a 185° viewing angle automatically produce a fisheye image?