Why are very fast lenses much more expensive than slower versions of the same focal length?
Asked 4/18/2013
5 views
2 answers
0
Lenses with larger maximum apertures often cost much more than slower lenses of the same focal length—for example f/1.8 vs f/1.4 vs f/1.2. Is that mainly because manufacturers charge more for the perceived value, or are fast lenses genuinely much harder and more expensive to design and build?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
7
The F number is the ratio between focal length and the the apparent light opening size. this means that you have to make a larger lens for the same focal length. you also get a larger surface that hte light rays enter, and they all have to be focused onto a little dot, smaller than your pixel size to be sharp. If you at the same time have a zoom lens this is even more difficult, especially if you want to keep the same ratio. Even more complexity. So you see how fixed aperture lenses are hard to make. Furthermore, they are also more sought for, especially by professionals - this also adds to the price, and even more value, as they choose to make them dedicated for pros, meaning overall build quality is boosted as well.
So in conclusion, the things that make them costly are:
- More weight, more material
- Optically more complex to make, especially zooms
- and more especially fixed wide aperture zooms
- cheaper versions are often very soft wide open, especially zooms.
- the demand is high
- the wide aperture lenses are also often "made for pros"
Originally by user11455. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11455
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Fast lenses are usually genuinely more expensive to make, not just priced higher for marketing. A lower f-number at the same focal length means a larger entrance pupil, so the lens needs larger glass elements. Those larger elements are harder to manufacture, heavier, and more expensive.
The bigger challenge is optical design: when light enters through a wider opening, it is much harder to focus all those rays sharply onto the sensor while controlling aberrations and distortion. That often requires more elements, more complex designs, and tighter manufacturing tolerances.
Those added optics increase size and weight, which can also require stronger focusing mechanisms, sturdier mounts, and better overall construction. In many cases, fast lenses are also aimed at professional users, so manufacturers often pair the optics with higher-grade build quality, which raises cost further.
So the price difference is usually driven by real engineering and manufacturing difficulty, plus the fact that these lenses are often built to a higher standard for a smaller, more demanding market.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why are ultra-fast lenses so difficult and expensive to make?
What are ultra-fast lenses like f/1.2, f/0.95, or f/0.7 actually used for?
Why do 35mm lenses with similar focal length and aperture vary so much in price?
Are the limits on lens aperture, image stabilization, and ultra-wide focal lengths physical or just practical?
Why are ultra-fast built-in camera lenses (f/1.0–f/1.2) so rare?