Why do 35mm lenses with similar focal length and aperture vary so much in price?

Asked 9/20/2016

4 views

2 answers

0

I’m comparing several 35mm lenses for Canon and noticed that lenses with roughly the same focal length and maximum aperture can have very different prices. Examples include Samyang/Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 versions, Tamron 35mm f/1.8 VC, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM, Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM, and Zeiss 35mm f/1.4. What factors typically drive these price differences? Also, why was the Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II so much more expensive than the original 35mm f/1.4L?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

4

First off, the Canon EF 35mm f/1.4 L USM sold for well over $999 most places before it was superseded by a new and improved model. About $1,350-1,400 was the common price of the original lens for many years. Now that the EF 35mm f/1.4 L II is available and has been confirmed to be a significantly better lens in terms of its optical performance the market value of the older model has gone down. The new still hasn't worn off the EF 35mm f/1.4 L II that has only been out a few months. Eventually you can probably expect the price of the newer lens to settle down from its introductory price of around $1,800 to somewhere in the $1,400-1,500 range, depending on how the yen/dollar exchange rates fluctuate.

The price difference between the original and II version of Canon lenses is similar to the way the price of a 2016 automobile will drop after the 2017 version of the same car has been introduced with a significant update in the design or performance of the car. The dealers will reduce the price of the older model to move the remaining inventory.

Samyang and Rokinon lenses are often designed and manufactured by the same company and marketed under a variety of names. Bower, Vivitar, Falcon, Walimex, Opteka, Bell and Howell, Polar, and Pro-Optic are other names under which the same lenses are sometimes branded. The "chipped" versions mean they will communicate aperture settings and other lens identifying information with the camera for which they are specified. All are manually focused lenses without the ability to use autofocus.

The Tamron and Sigma offerings are each their own design but do include autofocus in their capabilities. As with most third party lenses, the AF usually isn't as fast or as accurate as Canon's own lenses with the same focal length and maximum aperture. Third party lenses may not work with newer camera models introduced after the lens was released without a firmware update from the manufacturer. Recently both Sigma and Tamron have created products that allow the end user to update the firmware on their most recent lenses without requiring the lens to take a trip to the nearest factory service center.

Zeiss is a German maker of lenses that has long been regarded as some of the best in the world. They are also typically manual focus lenses. Some of their current offerings live up to the high price and the reputation the name has built over the past century, others don't.

Different lenses are like different cars. Some are made to be budget savers and offer only the bare necessities. Others offer different features. One may be fast and sporty in the way it handles, but only has room for two persons. Others may be heavier and slower but able to accommodate more passengers and/or cargo. Others may offer a blend of performance and utility. Others may be seen as luxury vehicles.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Price differences come from more than focal length and f-number. Lenses can differ in optical quality, autofocus system, image stabilization, build quality, weather sealing, coatings, compatibility features, and quality control. Brand positioning and market timing matter too.

In your list, some lower-cost lenses are manual-focus designs or simpler versions, while others add autofocus, stabilization, electronic communication, or higher-end construction. Premium lenses may also aim for better sharpness wide open, lower distortion, less chromatic aberration, better flare resistance, and more consistent performance across the frame.

The Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II was priced much higher than the original largely because it was a newer optical design and was widely regarded as a significant improvement in image quality. New models often launch at a premium, especially when they clearly outperform the older version. At the same time, the older lens’s price often drops once it is superseded.

So even when two lenses are both “35mm” and “f/1.4,” they may be very different products in terms of features, performance, and age.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer