Why are ultra-fast built-in camera lenses (f/1.0–f/1.2) so rare?
Asked 5/17/2013
3 views
2 answers
0
Why don’t more fixed-lens digital cameras offer extremely bright built-in lenses such as f/1.0 or f/1.2, especially since many use smaller sensors than film cameras? You can find plenty of superzoom compacts, but very few fixed-lens cameras with larger sensors and very fast apertures. Camcorders also sometimes seem to advertise very bright lenses. Is there a technical reason ultra-fast integrated lenses are uncommon?
Originally by user19869. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user19869
13y ago
2 Answers
9
I believe F1.4 is the best you can do on a compact so far:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/7/18/Panasonic-announces-Lumix-DMC-LX7-with-F1-4-2-3-24-90mm-lens
You know from 35mm format lenses that it is hard to find those that are sharp wide open. it is hard to get all those rays of light to hit a single small dot. On a compact sensor, those dots are even smaller and you need a lot of glass to correct those rays to fit into a tight spot, making the lens design pretty expensive. Now, expensive components and compact cameras don't go hand in hand, because people who buy compacts, are usually not the type who wants an expensive camera - they go for DSLRs. So the F1.4 is pretty impressive for a 500-600E price point, but the lens does take up quite some space for a compact.
Originally by user11455. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11455
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—mainly size, optical complexity, and cost. A wider maximum aperture requires a physically larger lens, and that gets harder as focal length and zoom range increase. That’s why compact cameras with bright lenses usually have limited zoom ranges, and many start around f/1.8 but become much slower when zoomed in.
Designing an ultra-fast lens that stays sharp wide open is also difficult. At apertures beyond about f/1.4, controlling aberrations and focusing light accurately onto very small sensor pixels becomes increasingly challenging, which often demands more glass and more complex correction.
That works against the main goals of compact cameras: small size and lower price. In consumer fixed-lens cameras, the market usually won’t support the added bulk and expense. As a result, f/1.4 is already exceptional in a compact; examples mentioned include cameras like the Panasonic LX7.
So the short answer is: it’s technically possible, but usually impractical for compact, affordable cameras—especially if you also want zoom, portability, and good image quality.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why are very fast ultra-wide lenses rare, and are there Canon-compatible options faster than f/2.8?
What are ultra-fast lenses like f/1.2, f/0.95, or f/0.7 actually used for?
Why are lenses faster than f/1 so rare, and what changes in their design?
Why aren’t fixed-aperture interchangeable lenses more common?
Why don’t more cameras have built-in neutral density (ND) filters?