Why are tripods banned in some public or semi-public places, and what can photographers do about it?
Asked 5/23/2011
2 views
2 answers
0
I was stopped by security from using a tripod in a train station, even though it was not listed on the posted prohibited-items sign. I complied, but it made me wonder why some venues are so concerned about tripods when handholding or improvised support may be allowed.
In general, why do some public or semi-public spaces prohibit tripods? Is it mainly about safety, security, commercial photography, or image-rights concerns?
What is the best practical way to handle this as a photographer? Is it worth asking management for permission in advance or following up afterward if security says no? Are there common alternatives, such as monopods or small support systems, that are more acceptable?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
45
If it's a crowded, public place - it's often perceived as a tripping hazard by many a security guard, possibly even a weapon. Its also possible that if its photographing public art, they don't want you to "steal" it.
There are times were it makes sense to try to get permission if you need to a long exposure. Depending on the person, they may ask you to take other precautions (caution tape, cones, etc) to ward off potential trippers or they may just tell you no.
If you don't need really long exposures, but just some more stability, try a monopod (this confuses enough people because they don't know what it is, that you can often get away with it). If you need the stability, try a Gorillapod or other clamping system.
If they don't want you to "steal" it, then you may just be out of luck unless you obtain special permission.
Originally by user1917. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1917
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Tripods are often restricted for practical reasons rather than camera-specific ones. Common concerns are that they create a tripping hazard in busy areas, obstruct foot traffic, or are seen by security as a safety/security risk. In some venues, a tripod can also signal “serious” or commercial photography, which may raise concerns about photography policies, public art, or sales of official images.
The simplest approach on site is usually to comply politely if asked. If you still want the shot, contact venue management afterward or in advance and ask for clarification or permission; security staff may be applying a policy loosely, and management may allow it.
If you need extra stability but not a full tripod, alternatives mentioned were a monopod or a small clamping/support system such as a Gorillapod. Those are sometimes more acceptable, depending on the venue.
If permission is granted, expect that they may require added precautions in crowded places. If the venue simply does not allow tripod use, there may not be much you can do beyond working within the rules or returning with prior approval.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can security restrict photography at Birmingham New Street Station and Grand Central?
How can a crowded station long-exposure shot be captured with blurred motion and some sharp subjects?
How can I diplomatically reassure a private property owner that casual photography in an open public space isn't a threat?
How do I photograph a fast-moving object from a moving train without blur?
Why do some tweeted news photos show a thin 1px black horizontal line?