How can I diplomatically reassure a private property owner that casual photography in an open public space isn't a threat?
Asked 11/23/2010
7 views
2 answers
0
I photographed from areas open to the public in a privately owned plaza/park between office buildings and was asked by security to stop. I left, then contacted the owner, who replied politely. I'm not looking for legal arguments or a debate about photographers' rights. Instead, I'd like a calm, persuasive way to explain to a non-hostile owner—who may simply be relying on security's default anti-photography stance—that ordinary photography in an open, publicly accessible space is usually harmless. Are there good approaches or talking points for this conversation?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
6
Great question.
From the tone of your article is that you're looking to keep discussions cordial, refraining from using legal jujitsu to make your argument.
Does the park have an official policy regarding photography? Is it well defined, and obvious to any public passerby? If not, legally the park owners could be liable for any damages from a harassment charges brought on by John. Q. Photographer--if building security was there on the behest of the park owners, and there was no official photography policy, or it was not clear.
Has the park owner had any complaints by other patrons about photographers?
I think the most compelling resource would be an amazing photos shot while in his park. Perhaps even a nicely framed and mounted print as a gift. The park provides a beautiful space that is enjoyed by so many people; and photographers only add to that.
At any rate, keep us informed with how your discussions are going. I know I'm intrigued by this.
Originally by user170. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user170
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A productive approach is to keep it practical and non-confrontational rather than legalistic.
Start by asking what specific harm they’re worried about: “What are you concerned a photographer might do here?” That often helps separate general security fears from actual risks. In an open plaza/park, many of the concerns security has for office interiors or restricted areas may not really apply.
It also helps to ask whether they have a clear photography policy. If they want restrictions, those should be defined and communicated consistently rather than enforced ad hoc.
The most persuasive case may be positive rather than argumentative: show the kind of images being made and how they present the space well. A strong photo of the property can demonstrate that photography is often promotion, documentation, or personal expression—not a threat.
Finally, behavior matters. Be open about photographing, avoid acting secretive, respect people who don’t want to be photographed, and stay courteous. A calm, visible photographer is much less likely to be perceived as suspicious than someone evasive or confrontational.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
No related questions yet.