Why are 18-200mm superzoom lenses more expensive than buying 18-55mm and 55-200mm separately?

Asked 9/19/2012

3 views

2 answers

0

I'm comparing an 18-200mm lens with a two-lens kit such as 18-55mm plus 55-200mm. In many cases, the single 18-200mm costs more than the two separate lenses together. What makes the 18-200mm more expensive? Is it mainly the convenience of having one lens, or are there other design and feature differences? From an image-quality and value standpoint, is it usually better to buy the two separate lenses instead of one 18-200mm superzoom?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

9

That is the price because that is how much enough customers are willing to pay for it.

While they are complex lenses, they are not high quality ones (the Nikon is sharper with more distortions) and both are quite dim on the long end.

The price is for convenience of changing lenses less often, or not all all. After all, comfort and convenience are very valuable aspects.

On the other hand, the 18-55mm lenses you mention are cheap, low quality and not convenient either. If you pay more for less coverage, you will get much better quality of out your camera. You can always buy more focal-length later by adding new lenses rather than buying disabled ones.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A single 18-200mm is usually priced higher mainly because it offers convenience: one lens covers a very wide range, so you change lenses less often or not at all. That convenience has real value, and designing a lens that works across such a large zoom range is also more complex.

In general, superzooms like 18-200mm are a compromise lens. Compared with shorter-range zooms, they often give up some sharpness, have more distortion, and are relatively slow at the long end. The two-lens option can be cheaper, but those kit lenses are also basic lenses and not necessarily high quality either.

Price differences also come from other factors besides focal length, such as build quality, autofocus motor, and image stabilization.

So the choice depends on priorities:

  • Choose 18-200mm if convenience and fewer lens changes matter most.
  • Choose 18-55mm + 55-200mm if lower cost matters more and you don't mind swapping lenses.
  • If image quality is the main goal, spending more on better lenses with less zoom range—or even primes—often gives better results than either budget kit zooms or a superzoom.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer