Canon 550D: replace the 18-55 kit lens with an 18-200mm, or add the 55-250mm for more reach?

Asked 2/21/2011

5 views

2 answers

0

I have a Canon EOS 550D with the 18-55mm IS kit lens, and I’m mainly looking for more telephoto reach because 55mm often feels too short. I’m comparing two options:

  1. Replace the kit lens with an 18-200mm IS superzoom for all-in-one convenience
  2. Keep the 18-55mm and add the 55-250mm IS for extra reach

I’d like to understand the pros and cons of each approach, especially optical quality versus convenience, and whether the 18-200mm is worth the much higher cost. I’m unlikely to print larger than A4.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

15

The 18-200 might be more expensive, but I don't think I've ever seen a lens getting worse reviews. (There are two reviews linked there, and they're two of the friendlier ones.)

The 55-250mm, on the other hand, gets rave optical reviews. The worst thing anyone has to say about it is that, well, it is mostly plastic. Really good, solid, well-built plastic, but plastic. And there's some vignetting wide-open that's down to "wont notice it in the real world" levels once you've stopped down one stop. It's sharp, there's only the tiniest amount of barrel distortion at the 55mm end, chromatic aberration is at the sub-pixel level, and once you've taken the aperture off of "full blast" the light distribution is very even.

Given a choice between the two, go for the 55-250mm, no question.

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For your stated goal—more telephoto reach—the 55-250mm IS is the better choice.

Why:

  • Image quality: The community feedback strongly favors the 55-250mm. It’s widely regarded as very good optically, especially for the price.
  • More reach: It goes to 250mm instead of 200mm.
  • Better value: It costs much less than the 18-200mm.
  • Good match with your current lens: The 18-55 + 55-250 pairing covers a very useful range.

Tradeoffs:

  • Lens changes: The main advantage of the 18-200mm is convenience. You avoid swapping lenses and have one do-it-all option.
  • Superzoom compromises: Lenses with such a wide zoom range usually give up optical performance, and the 18-200mm was viewed quite poorly compared with the 55-250mm.
  • Build: The 55-250mm is lightweight and mostly plastic, but still considered solid for normal use.

So if you care most about convenience, the 18-200mm is simpler. If you care about results and value, the 55-250mm is the better buy. If your budget stretches higher and you want a more serious telephoto upgrade, some users also suggested considering the Canon 70-200mm f/4L.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer