Which used Nikon body is the best second camera alongside a D40: D80, D100, or D1X?

Asked 1/2/2011

8 views

2 answers

0

I use a Nikon D40 and want an inexpensive second body so my fiancée and I can each shoot with one camera. My budget is about €300. One reason for upgrading is that the D40 lacks an in-body focus motor and does not meter with older manual-focus lenses.

I’m considering these used bodies:

  • Nikon D80: in-body AF motor, 10 MP, lighter, newer than the others
  • Nikon D100: older but sturdier body, in-body AF motor, better compatibility with older lenses
  • Nikon D1X: pro body, very robust, larger/heavier, supports and meters many older Nikon lenses

I’m a hobbyist, not a pro, and I mostly shoot for enjoyment rather than fast action. I also already own some older manual lenses that are difficult to use on the D40 because of the lack of metering.

Given image quality, handling, age, lens compatibility, and value, which of these makes the most sense as a second body?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

8

Firstly the D1X doesn't have a full size (35mm) sensor it's a 1.5 crop like the others. It's also getting pretty old now so unless you really need what it specifically offers (i.e. build quality) I would look elsewhere. Cameras have come on a long way in the last ten years, image quality wise I would expect it to be blown out of the water by the current entry level models. By image quality I mean resolution, sharpness, colour reproduction and noise.

Same applies to the D100 to an extent. You'd be surprised by what basic features are missing from even pro level bodies that are a certain age. I'm not a Nikon shooter so hopefully someone else can give you some other alternatives with regard to lens compatibility, but my advice would be to look for something released in the last four years.

I know you're only doing this as a hobby and so maybe image quality doesn't matter, however I speak from experience when I recommend you get the newest body you can. I recently upgraded from a 1D mkII to a mkIV, a gap of about 5 years in terms of camera developments. Instantly I found the new body is just so much nicer to use, the controls are laid out better and more logically, there are loads of useful settings that were missing before. The screen is so much better I don't know how I coped with the tiny low res screen on the mkII. Battery life is also better, partially because of newer technology and partially because the original battery is worn out.

At the end of the day a body that is pleasant and fun to use is the important thing. If the new body is a pain to use compared to your D40, you wont look forward to using it and wont get good pictures.

Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1375

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Of those three, the D80 is the safest overall choice; the D100 is only worth considering if older-lens compatibility is your top priority; the D1X is hard to recommend unless you specifically want its pro build and handling.

Key points from the replies:

  • The D1X does not have a full-frame sensor; it’s also a 1.5x crop body.
  • Both the D1X and D100 are very old, and older pro bodies can miss features you’d expect today.
  • Image quality from the D1X in particular is likely to lag well behind newer entry-level cameras.
  • A used D200 was suggested as a better upgrade path if you can save a bit more: solid build, good image quality, and a step up from the D40.
  • The D100 still has some appeal for slower-paced shooting: good battery life, sturdy build, bracketing, older AF lens support, and decent image quality at lower ISO.

So: choose the D80 for balance, the D100 for cheap older-lens use, and skip the D1X unless you truly want it for its build/feel. If possible, save for a D200.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer