Which is better for short video: Canon EOS 500D or Nikon D3100?

Asked 11/6/2010

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m choosing a camera mainly for shooting short videos and I’m comparing the Canon EOS 500D with the Nikon D3100. The 500D offers 1080p at 20 fps, while the D3100 offers 1080p at 24 fps. For video use, how important is the difference between 20 fps and 24 fps, and which camera is the better choice if I don’t already own lenses in either system?

Originally by Sidd. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Sidd

15y ago

2 Answers

4

If you're primarily interested in video, the Nikon option offers 1080p and 24 frames per second with autofocus. This exceeds the 500D all around, so if you have no lens investment in Canon, I'd have to advise the D3100.

Originally by user472. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user472

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For video, the Nikon D3100 is the better choice of these two if you don’t already have lenses tying you to Canon. Based on the answers, its 1080p/24 fps recording is preferable to the 500D’s 1080p/20 fps, and it also offers autofocus in video.

The 20 fps vs 24 fps difference does matter. For static shots like a talking head, 20 fps may be acceptable, but once you pan the camera or film motion, 20 fps can look noticeably less smooth and more jerky. 24 fps is the more standard cinematic frame rate and generally gives better-looking motion.

If you’re open to another Canon body, one answer suggests stepping up to the Canon 550D, which adds 24 fps and is considered a much stronger video option than the 500D.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer