When stand developing film, do you need different development times for pushed exposures?

Asked 10/9/2012

6 views

2 answers

0

I saw an example of Kodak Tri-X shot at ISO 400, 800, 1600, and 3200, all developed together in Rodinal 1:100 for about 60 minutes with very little agitation. The negatives looked surprisingly similar apart from grain and shadow detail.

When using stand development, do you still need to change development time for different EI ratings, or does the process largely self-limit? Does this depend on the developer and dilution being used?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

11

A great deal here depends on the developer you're using. In this case, there are three key ingredients. First, is the fact that it's Rodinal. Rodinal is a one-use developer, meaning that you use it once, and then throw it away, because the chemicals get "used up' in the course of developing one batch of film. Second is the high dilution, to keep the amount of chemical available in any one part of the film to a minimum. Third is the minimal agitation -- basically, just enough to give a reasonable assurance against air bubble forming on the film.

With a typical developer, you control the amount of development by the time you let the film sit in the developer. The developer is concentrated enough that the longer you let it sit, the more it develops.

With Rodinal at 1:100, you're basically just letting it develop until the developer is used up. If you were to let the film sit in the developer for another hour or two, it wouldn't make much difference either -- the developer is pretty well used up by then, so if you let it sit for (say) another hour or two, it wouldn't change much more. The lack of agitation means that (for the most part) as the developer gets used up, it stays close to the area of the film that used it up. In areas that had different exposure the developer will be used up at a different rate, so you (mostly) want to keep it in place, to assure against less-used developer getting redistributed around to places that it would continue development too long.

A different developer (e.g., D-76) would change the situation entirely though -- most other developers contain enough chemical to develop quite a bit of film. Even if you minimize agitation, if you left film in D-76 for an hour, it would be so over-developed it probably wouldn't be usable.

Summary: in the case of Rodinal, the development time isn't critical because the developer itself is basically self-limiting. With most other developers, however, the amount of development is controlled by the time the film is in the developer, so the time and temperature are critical to control the total development of the film.

Originally by user603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user603

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Usually, stand development is meant to be self-limiting, so development time changes much less than with normal processing. With a highly diluted, one-shot developer like Rodinal at 1:100 and minimal agitation, development relies on local developer exhaustion: highlights develop quickly, then the developer in those areas gets used up, which helps restrain further development.

That’s why frames exposed at different EIs can end up looking more similar than you’d expect, especially in overall density. The visible differences tend to be in grain, shadow detail, and how much underexposure the shadows can tolerate.

However, this is not universal. It depends on the developer, dilution, agitation, and having enough actual developer concentrate in the tank. In stand development, the total amount of developer matters a lot; if there’s too little concentrate, the film can end up underdeveloped before development is complete.

So: with true stand development, you often do not adjust time much for moderate pushing, but results depend strongly on the developer and minimum amount of concentrate used.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer