What can I photograph for astrophotography with a barndoor tracker and a 200mm f/2.8 lens?
Asked 7/12/2015
5 views
2 answers
0
I have a homemade computerized barndoor tracker and a Canon 6D with a 70-200mm f/2.8 lens. Tracking accuracy is limited mostly by how well I built and aligned the tracker. I’ll be shooting from a very dark site in central Italy in mid-August, and this will be my first night-sky trip, so I’d like to plan targets in advance.
At 200mm, what kinds of astrophotography subjects are realistically worth trying? I already know about Andromeda, the Pinwheel Galaxy, and the Pleiades.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
2
with a 200mm lens you are going to struggle to see anything much, I would highly recommend you get a teleconverter, as at 200mm even the moon will be tiny.
But more importantly, TEST IT BEFORE YOU GO!!!
Originally by user9999. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user9999
11y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A 200mm lens on a full-frame camera is better suited to wider deep-sky subjects than to small objects needing high magnification. Galaxies and the Moon will look fairly small at 200mm, so don’t expect large, detailed images of compact targets.
From a very dark site, your best bets are brighter, larger deep-sky objects and wide-field night-sky scenes. Dark skies especially help with faint objects that are hard or impossible to capture well from light-polluted locations. Large targets like Andromeda and the Pleiades are reasonable ideas; in general, focus on bigger deep-sky subjects rather than tiny ones.
A key point: test your setup before the trip. Since your barndoor tracker is homemade, real-world tracking accuracy, alignment, and lens performance matter more than theory. Do trial sessions at home to find:
- how long you can expose before stars trail
- whether 200mm is practical on your tracker
- how accurate your polar alignment needs to be
- which focal lengths in your 70-200 range work best
If 200mm feels too limited for small targets, a teleconverter could give you more reach, but the dark site itself is still best used for wide and bright deep-sky objects rather than highly magnified imaging.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should I stop down a 70-200mm f/2.8 for Andromeda, or shoot wide open?
How can I improve sharpness in astrophotography with a barn-door tracker?
Which lens is better for a vacation on a Canon T2i: 17-40mm f/4 or 15mm fisheye?
Why am I getting star trails with an iOptron SkyTracker Pro at 400mm, even at 5 seconds?
When is a 70-200mm f/2.8 worth the size, weight, and cost?