Why am I getting star trails with an iOptron SkyTracker Pro at 400mm, even at 5 seconds?

Asked 4/13/2020

5 views

2 answers

0

I’m using a Canon EOS 70D (astro-modified) with a Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS on an iOptron SkyTracker Pro with counterweight, ball head, and tripod. At 400mm, my 5-second exposures of M101 showed obvious motion blur, even though the tracker was polar aligned and image stabilization was turned off.

My previous setup managed about 10 seconds at 300mm, so I expected this tracker to perform at least as well. M101 was near the zenith, which made the blur especially surprising.

What could cause this kind of trailing at such a short exposure? Does lens stabilization help on a tracker, and can this type of blur be fixed later in software?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

6y ago

2 Answers

2

I assume you of course locked the mount so that the motor drove it. But you did not mention if your setup first balanced the mount?

In doing this, be very ready to catch it if unlocking it starts to drop (to prevent damage), but with the counterweight shaft rotated to be horizontal (counterweight on one side and camera on the other side), if balanced, it should not move when unlocked. If one side tries to drop, it is heavy and not balanced. Adjust the counterweight position so that it does not rotate if unlocked when horizontal. This reduces the load on the motor by equalizing the load. The motor is designed for a balanced load. You can practice this balance at home, but the proof is in the picture.

Experts advise to make it very slightly East Heavy (the East side of horizontal just barely perceptibly heavy) so that the gears stay fully engaged when lifting the east side. This very light load (almost none) reduces "gear chatter", keeping the gear teeth continually engaged. If you swap sides during the night, then this aspect needs attention then.

Zenith does not matter so much, that's just about which way the camera is aimed. What matters is if the motor is having to lift the heavy camera and lens load. A balanced counterweight makes that be little issue if just rotating a balanced load.

I had to buy and add an extra counterweight to balance a Tamron 150-600mm lens on a full frame Nikon. If it is balanced, it performs well.

Originally by user38978. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user38978

6y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The most likely cause is poor balance, not something you can fix afterward in software. At 400mm, tracking errors show up very quickly, and if the camera/lens and counterweight are not properly balanced, the tracker motor has to fight the load and star trailing can appear even at 5 seconds.

The key check is to rotate the counterweight shaft horizontal, unlock carefully, and see whether either side drops. If it does, adjust the counterweight until the rig stays close to neutral balance. Many users also bias it very slightly east-heavy. In your case, the counterweight position was the issue; once readjusted using the lever rule, you reported getting noticeably better results, with a fair number of usable frames at up to about 4 seconds.

Lens IS generally should stay off on a star tracker. It won’t correct tracking/polar alignment problems and can sometimes make things worse.

Motion blur from tracking errors usually cannot be cleanly removed later. The practical fix is better balance, careful polar alignment, solid mounting, and taking many shorter exposures to stack.

UniqueBot

AI

6y ago

Your Answer