Upgrading from a Nikon P510 for bird photography: what DSLR and lens reach do I need?

Asked 7/30/2015

1 views

2 answers

0

I’m currently using a Nikon P510 bridge camera and mostly shoot wildlife, especially birds. I rely on the long zoom a lot, but I’m running into image-quality limits when I crop heavily. I’ve been considering a Nikon D5200, but I’m open to other cameras in a similar price range.

What focal length would I need on a DSLR or APS-C camera to get a similar field of view to the P510’s long zoom? Would this require more than one lens, and what should I realistically expect in terms of size and cost for bird photography gear?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

11y ago

2 Answers

2

The Nikon P510 is what usually is referred to as a bridge camera. That is a camera somewhere in between a point-and-shoot and a DSLR. It has got a zoom lens, but the term zoom does not mean that you will get a narrow angle of view (close to the subject). It means that you can adjust the focal length of the lens and therefore the angle of view (how close or far away from the subject you'll get).

The lens that it uses corresponds to a 24-1000 mm-lens on a full frame camera. In order to cover that range with a DSLR you would have to use multiple lenses and the longer ones would be very, very expensive.

Since you're looking for a DSLR with aN APS-C lens you will have to take the crop factor into account when determining what lens(es) you'll need. 24 mm corresponds to a 18 mm-lens on an APS-C camera and to get a focal length of 1000 mm you'll need a bit over 600 mm and that lens costs around $10 000.

Of course you can use a shorter lens (a lens with a shorter focal length), but then you'll have to crop the photo.

Even though the lenses the lenses giving you the same capabilities as the P510 on the long end are very expensive, a DSLR might still be useful with a shorter lens (there are 18-300 mm lenses, corresponding to 24-450 mm due to the crop factor that cost around $700 and given that a cropped 300 mm APS-C image to a corresponding 1000 mm on a P510 will look a lot better it might be worth it. The DSLR:s also has a lot better performance in autofocus and I suggest that you'll try one out in a store with a longer lens to learn the differnce.

Originally by user21986. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user21986

11y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Your P510’s lens is roughly equivalent to 24–1000mm in full-frame terms, so matching that range on a DSLR with one lens isn’t realistic. On an APS-C body like the Nikon D5200, you’d need multiple lenses, and for birds you’ll likely want at least 400mm equivalent, often more.

A common wildlife setup would be something like a general-purpose zoom plus a long telephoto such as a 150–600mm lens. That would cover bird photography far better than a standard kit lens, but it’s a big jump in both cost and size. Community answers suggest long wildlife zooms in this class are around the $1000+ range, with total lens cost often around $1500 or more if you need two lenses.

Also note that on Nikon entry bodies like the D5xxx series, autofocus compatibility matters: they autofocus only with AF-S lenses. For birding, that can limit affordable Nikon lens choices compared with some Canon options.

So yes, a DSLR can improve image quality, but to keep the long-reach capability you enjoy now, the lens is the real expense—and long telephoto lenses are large and heavy.

UniqueBot

AI

11y ago

Your Answer