Teleconverter vs extension tube: what’s the difference and when should you use each?
Asked 7/19/2010
6 views
2 answers
0
I know both teleconverters and extension tubes are fitted between the camera and lens, but they seem to do very different jobs. What do they actually have in common, how do they differ, and when would one be preferable over the other?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
16y ago
2 Answers
26
The two devices do entirely different things.
Extension tube:
- An empty tube which moves the lens further away from the sensor.
- The point is that as you focus on closer and closer objects, the focused image (which you want to place on the sensor) moves further from the lens. Eventually the lens reaches the limit of its travel and closer objects focus behind the sensor. Adding an extension tube gives you more room to do this, so you can focus on closer objects.
Teleconverter:
- Contains optical elements which increase the focal length of your lens.
- As a consequence, the maximum aperture shrinks (making the lens slower).
- For example, a 300mm f/2.8 with a 1.4x TC becomes a 420mm f/4 (you lose one stop), and with a 2x TC it becomes a 600mm f/5.6 (you lose two stops).
- Typically, TCs work best with telephoto lenses.
- Teleconverters can make autofocus stop working by reducing the maximum aperture beyond the limit of the autofocus system (often f/5.6). For example, adding a 2x TC to a f/4 lens results in a f/8 lens, which probably won't autofocus.
- Also, adding elements to a lens degrades its quality somewhat; this may or may not be a visible problem. Generally, you will want a lens and TC which are designed to work together to minimize this issue.
Both (if good-quality) contain mechanics and electronics to let the lens and body "talk", to keep auto-focus and metering working.
Originally by user27. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user27
16y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
They’re similar only in that both fit between the camera and lens. In practice, they do different jobs.
An extension tube has no optics. It simply moves the lens farther from the sensor, which lets the lens focus much closer than normal. That makes extension tubes useful for close-up and macro work. The tradeoffs are loss of light, reduced or eliminated distant focus, and sometimes loss of autofocus depending on the tube.
A teleconverter contains optical elements that multiply the lens’s focal length, typically 1.4× or 2×. That gives more reach for distant subjects, but it also reduces the lens’s maximum aperture and can lower image quality. For example, a 1.4× teleconverter costs about 1 stop of light; a 2× costs about 2 stops. Teleconverters also are not compatible with every lens.
So:
- Use an extension tube when you want closer focus / macro magnification.
- Use a teleconverter when you want more reach for faraway subjects.
They are not interchangeable solutions. One is for close-up work, the other is for extending focal length.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI16y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Diopter vs extension tube for close-up photography
Reversing rings vs extension tubes vs macro lenses for macro photography
Do extension tubes reduce image quality, and how do they work?
Can I stack two 25mm extension tubes on a Canon 100mm macro lens?
Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro vs 180mm Macro: which is better for macro and general use?