Should you photograph weddings for friends or family, and do you charge?

Asked 1/8/2013

6 views

2 answers

0

I’m sometimes asked to photograph weddings for friends or family. I’m not a full-time pro, but I do occasional paid work and have shot several weddings. The issue isn’t just money: wedding photography is a lot of work, requires full attention all day, means you miss being a normal guest, and involves a lot of editing afterward.

For those who’ve faced this, do you make it a policy to refuse weddings for close friends or relatives? If you do accept, do you charge your normal rate, discount it, or treat it as a gift? How do you decide when it’s appropriate to say yes or no without harming expectations or relationships?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

13

I am a amateur, but am sometimes thought of as the "photographer" in the family. People pictures aren't my thing, but I do it when there are significant events I would be stuck having to attend anyway. Ususally these events are boring, so I don't mind taking pictures. It gives me something to do and gives me a good excuse to not have to sit there while Aunt Fuddyduddy keeps everyone so spellbound describing here latest ailments and cures and interrupts if anyone tries to change the subject.

The time for taking the pictures is therefore free, even a welcome alternative to Aunt Fuddyduddy. The unpaid time-consuming work is later to post process and thin the lot to ones that are at least acceptable. Others don't understand and appreciate how much time it takes to do this right. This is the real favor they are asking, although they rarely understand that.

I make it clear up front that all they should expect from me is a DVD with the presentable pictures in preview and full res formats. It's up them what they want to select to print, put in a book, or whatever they want to do with any of the pictures. I use my normal system for documenting a set of pictures, which includes a tree of HTML files, several preview sizes, and record of the date/time and other info about each picture. You can pop the DVD into any computer and look over the pictures, drill down to get more detail on any of them, sequence thru the bunch, and retrieve the full res versions for possible printing and the like. It still takes hours to put all that together, but it's a lot less work than what a formal wedding photographer does.

Originally by user7603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user7603

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

There isn’t one right rule; it’s mostly about expectations, relationship, and whether you can reliably deliver.

A good test is: can you produce the results they expect, and are you willing to give up being a guest? Wedding coverage is a job, not casual attendance, and the editing afterward is a major time commitment many people underestimate.

Reasonable options are:

  • decline if you don’t enjoy weddings or would rather attend as a guest
  • accept and charge your usual rate, or a modest discount
  • do it as your wedding gift if you genuinely want to

You shouldn’t feel guilty about charging. Other wedding vendors usually aren’t expected to work for free just because they know the couple.

If the couple couldn’t hire a professional anyway, and you’re their best realistic option, helping out may make sense. But if they can afford a pro, the stakes and expectations are higher, so be careful unless you’re confident in your ability and backup gear.

If you say no, a helpful compromise is offering something lower-pressure, like an engagement or family shoot instead.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer