Should Olympus 5-axis image stabilization help at 1/5 second, or is blur normal?

Asked 3/8/2016

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m using an Olympus PEN E-P5 and expected the 5-axis in-body stabilization to help with slow handheld shots. In a shop test I set the lens to 19mm, aperture to f/22, and took a handheld photo at 1/5 second. When I zoomed in, the image still showed blur, and the salesperson told me stabilization does not work slower than 1/60 second.

Is that correct? I bought this camera partly for its stabilization, so I’m trying to understand whether my expectations are unrealistic, my handholding technique is the issue, or whether the stabilization may be faulty.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

6

This is generally not true. The image stabilization should be helping in that range. However, you can't expect miracles.

Olympus claims 5 stops of stabilization on that model, and, taking that down to a realistic real-world three stops, that means 1/5th second has the blur from camera shake you might otherwise expect at 1/40th of a second. Maybe a little better. If you're using a wide-angle lens, that's probably enough. If you're using a longer telephoto, motion-blur is to be expected. In, fact, even if we grant those nominal 5 stops, we're still talking about 1/160th-equivalent, and if we consider the rule of thumb of one-over-focal length, that means you should get acceptable results with somewhere between a 40mm and 160mm lens, but no longer than that — and only at normal print sizes, not pixel-peeping. Since you're zooming in to look for blur, it's no wonder you're finding it.

And all that isn't even considering subject motion, which is of course not affected by image stabilization. If you're photographing a human subject doing anything but holding very still, and bigger than tiny in the frame, you're going to get movement at 1/5th second.

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

No — that claim is not generally correct. Image stabilization is meant to help at slower shutter speeds, including around 1/5 second, but it does not guarantee perfectly sharp results.

At 19mm, 1/5 second is within the range where stabilization may help, especially with a wide lens. However, real-world performance is usually less than the headline claim, and blur can still happen depending on technique, how steady you are, and how you hold the camera.

A key point with the E-P5 is that composing on the rear screen can be less stable than using a viewfinder, because you lose the extra point of contact against your face. Mirrorless bodies are also light, which can make handholding harder.

So: stabilization should still be active below 1/60 second, but it won’t perform miracles. If every shot is blurry at moderate wide-angle focal lengths and slow speeds, that could suggest a problem, but a single blurred 1/5 second example does not prove the stabilizer is broken.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer