Should I use Nikon Active D-Lighting when shooting RAW (NEF)?

Asked 6/22/2013

2 views

2 answers

0

I shoot Nikon and I'm trying to decide whether to leave Active D-Lighting (ADL) on when recording NEF/RAW files. My understanding is that some software, such as Aperture, may ignore ADL settings in the RAW file. If that's true, is it better to turn ADL off and rely on careful exposure and RAW processing, or use JPEG/Nikon software to take advantage of ADL? Also, does ADL still help with the camera's histogram and highlight warnings when shooting RAW?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

3

Active D-Lighting doesn't do anything that you can't already do in Aperture (or Lightroom or similar). All it does is to reduce contrast in the highlights (depending on the strength of the highlights) so all (or at least more) of the detail can be fit into the 8-bit JPEG. Your RAW processor will let you control highlights to the same degree (and may, in some cases, read the "ADL Strength" tag in the NEF and adjust the default image adjustments).

What the ADL will do for you when you're shooting RAW is adjust the histogram and highlight warnings on the camera, which are based on the JPEG that results from your conversion settings (Optimize Image/Picture Control/ADL/White balance). That will give you a better idea of what levels are being recorded in the NEF (and, of course, what the resulting image will look like if you make the same adjustments the camera makes). Without ADL, the highlight warnings will turn on at lower levels, which may lead you to reduce exposure, potentially damaging the shadow detail in a high dynamic range scene. (Conversely, it can lead to slight overexposure decisions in flatter scenes, such as portraits, unnecessarily adding to post-processing time and effort.)

So while ADL may have little actual affect on what APerture presents to you, it's still a good guide for shooting RAW in landscapes, architecture and similar scenes.

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

If you shoot RAW, ADL is generally not essential because the same highlight/contrast adjustment can be done later in Aperture, Lightroom, or similar RAW editors. ADL mainly helps compress highlight contrast so more detail fits into the camera-generated 8-bit JPEG.

For NEF files, many RAW processors may ignore the ADL rendering, though some may read the ADL strength tag and use it as a starting point. So if your workflow is RAW-first, it's reasonable to leave ADL off and control highlights in post.

That said, ADL can still be useful when shooting RAW because the in-camera histogram and highlight warnings are based on the camera’s JPEG rendering. With ADL enabled, those previews may better reflect retained highlight detail and give you a more helpful guide while shooting.

In short:

  • RAW workflow: ADL is optional; you can do the same adjustment later.
  • JPEG workflow: ADL can be useful.
  • Mixed workflow: ADL may still help for reviewing exposure on the camera.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer