How can I recreate Nikon Active D-Lighting in post when shooting RAW?
Asked 9/21/2010
7 views
2 answers
0
I use a Nikon D5000 and have noticed more visible noise when Active D-Lighting is set to Auto. If I turn Active D-Lighting off, can I reproduce the same effect later in post-processing from RAW files? If so, what adjustments are needed, and are there any limits compared with using it in-camera?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
5
Active D-Lighting intentionally underexposes the image and then boosts the shadows (and applies other adjustments) hence the additional noise you're noticing. This is done to increase the highlight headroom and prevent losing information by blowing the highlights.
You can get a similar effect in most raw processing software by using custom tonecurves, or more advanced features such as fill light in Adobe Camera Raw, but if you turn D-Lighting off you must remember to underexpose as lost highlight information cannot be recovered in post!
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—roughly. Active D-Lighting works by slightly underexposing to protect highlights, then lifting shadows and applying a Nikon tone curve. That shadow lift is why noise can become more visible.
If you shoot RAW, you can mimic the effect in post with:
- a tone curve
- shadow/fill-light adjustments
- highlight recovery
But there’s an important limit: if you turn ADL off and expose normally, you may lose highlight detail that ADL would have preserved through its intentional underexposure. Blown highlights generally cannot be recovered later. So to get closest results, you’d need to preserve highlights at capture, then raise shadows in post.
If you want Nikon’s own rendering, Nikon Capture NX/NX2 can apply or adjust D-Lighting settings to RAW files after the fact. Third-party RAW editors can produce a similar dynamic-range-compression look, but may not match Nikon’s exact curve as closely.
So: yes, you can simulate it in post, especially from RAW, but the best match comes from preserving highlight headroom during capture and/or using Nikon’s software.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can RAW processing recreate the look of Fujifilm Velvia 50?
Should you leave Nikon Active D-Lighting and noise reduction on, or handle them in post?
When should you use in-camera processing instead of editing later?
Should I use Nikon Active D-Lighting when shooting RAW (NEF)?
Should I use in-camera high-ISO noise reduction when shooting RAW?