Should I pay extra for a Nikon AF-D lens just to get an aperture ring on a D7000?
Asked 6/22/2011
1 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to DSLRs and have a Nikon D7000 with the 18-105mm AF-S kit lens. I’m considering a telephoto in the 200–300mm range and found two versions of a Nikon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 AF lens: AF-D and AF-G. Since the D7000 has an in-body focus motor, I understand it can autofocus with older AF lenses.
My main question is whether the AF-D version is worth the extra cost just because it has a physical aperture ring. On the D7000, can I set aperture fully from the camera body instead? If I’m only planning to use the lens normally on my Nikon DSLR, will the AF-G give me the same or better results for less money, or are there practical reasons to prefer the AF-D?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
6
In most cases, the "G" lenses are newer designs that perform better than the older, "D" varieties (all other things being equal -- like the max aperture, etc.). They tend to have better lens coatings, better use of low dispersion, anomalous dispersion and aspherical elements, and more rounded apertures (which provide better bokeh). For use on DSLRs, the "D" lenses only have an advantage when you "freelens" or use the lens reverse-mounted or on a "dumb" tube for macro work, since there's no easy way to control the aperture on a "G" lens when it's not electrically connected to the camera.
"D" lenses, though, can be used on older, non-AF film cameras, where using manual exposure (or aperture-priority AE) means using the aperture ring -- there's no control over the aperture setting on the camera body other than what comes from the AE system in Auto, Program or shutter-priority mode.
If you have no plans to use an older Nikon film body, then the "G" lens is the way to go, particularly if the price differential is in your favour. But check the reputable reviewers before opting for "cheap for cheap's sake" -- there may be a very good reason why one particular lens is more expensive than another.
Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user2719
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For normal use on a Nikon D7000, you do not need the aperture ring. The camera can control aperture from its dials, so an AF-G lens will work fine in that respect.
Based on the answers, the AF-G version is generally the better choice if you’ll be using it on your Nikon DSLR only. “G” lenses are usually newer designs and may offer improvements such as better coatings, more modern optics, and sometimes smoother bokeh.
The AF-D lens mainly has an advantage if you want to use the lens in situations where the camera cannot control the aperture electronically, such as:
- adapted to another camera system
- reverse-mounted for macro
- used on extension tubes without electronic coupling
- used on older film bodies that rely on the aperture ring
So if your priority is value and standard use on the D7000, the AF-G is likely the smarter buy. Pay extra for AF-D only if you specifically need the aperture ring for adapted, reversed, or older-camera use.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Nikon G vs D prime lenses on a D7000: what changes besides the aperture ring?
Can I use a Nikon 35mm f/1.8G on a D7000 with a cheap non-electronic extension tube?
Why is Live View disabled on my Nikon D300 with a lens that has an aperture ring?
Can a Nikon G lens be retrofitted with an aperture ring for use on a Nikon FG?
What are the practical differences between Nikon D and G 50mm lenses?