Should I leave image adjustments off when shooting RAW, or let the camera apply them?

Asked 5/31/2017

3 views

2 answers

0

I usually shoot RAW and keep most in-camera processing settings low or off, such as saturation, contrast, high-ISO noise reduction, chromatic aberration correction, and peripheral illumination/vignetting correction. I do my edits later in Lightroom.

When shooting RAW, is it better to leave these settings off and handle everything in Lightroom? Do these camera settings affect the RAW file itself, or mainly the JPEG preview/output? Could the camera do some of these corrections as well as or better than Lightroom, or is post-processing still the better approach?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

4

There are two possibilities here:

  • Shoot RAW and none of those settings matter. The only reason to set them in this case is to see something appealing on the LCD since the settings are used to render the embedded JPEG in RAW files and that is shown on the rear LCD during Instant Review and Playback.

  • Shoot JPEG and set most settings in-camera. When the camera processes RAW data for rendering the JPEG image, it does so using the full-sensor color-depth which is often 12 or 14 bits in depth. When you process the JPEG in Lightroom or any other software, the you only get 8-bits of depth to work with. This means that the camera can render more smoothly and precise.

There is a way to get both and that is to shoot JPEG+RAW. You can use the JPEG to instantly get an image from each shutter-press and have the RAW in case you decide later that you would have liked different settings. This can be very useful since it actually takes time to change all the difference levels of sharpness, contrast, color, etc which can distract from shooting. Although the time is not saved, it is only postponed since you have to go that on the RAW later. Depending on your actual camera and software, some settings may be faster or slower to change in one or the other.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

If you shoot RAW, those in-camera settings usually do not change the actual RAW data. They mainly affect the camera-generated JPEG and the embedded preview JPEG you see on the LCD.

So for a RAW workflow, leaving them off is fine unless you want nicer-looking previews in camera. Lightroom gives you more control, and a skilled editor can usually get better, more consistent results manually.

If you shoot JPEG, in-camera corrections are more important because the camera applies them while creating the JPEG. That can be beneficial, since the camera processes from the original sensor data before it is reduced to an 8-bit JPEG.

A practical approach is to shoot RAW+JPEG if your camera allows it. Let the camera apply its settings to the JPEG, then compare those results with your Lightroom edits from the RAW file. That will show you which look you prefer and whether the time savings are worth it.

In short: for RAW, these settings mostly affect preview/JPEGs; for JPEG, they matter much more.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer