Should a beginner shoot RAW or JPEG?
Asked 2/13/2011
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to photography and don’t really know how to edit or retouch photos yet. Is it still worth shooting RAW, or should I stick with JPEG until I have a better workflow and editing skills?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
39
Im going to go against the grain and say that you should shoot with whatever format you find easier to work with.
The downside to raw is that it's a two step process. If you're a beginner, you might not have settled in on a workflow and may find that RAW files might be too cumbersome to work with.
I prefer RAW, and I generally think it's the better choice, but as a beginner, there are far more important things that should take your attention instead of editors, and file formats.
A RAW file isn't going to save your images from being boring, from being out of focus, or for being just plain bad. If you spend your time trying to retouch so-so looking photos just because you can, you'll miss out on learning how to take good photos first!
Said another way, a properly exposed jpeg looks far better than a mediocre photo shot with RAW.
Learning proper exposure techniques, framing, subject, and artistry are so much more important.
I think it's a fun exercise to go back and rework old images using new techniques, but I don't think its something that should be encouraged. Better to go out and take new photographs, than toil away and rehashing old ones. In my most humblest of opinions of course.
Originally by user170. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user170
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Either is fine for a beginner. RAW is usually the better long-term choice because it preserves more image data, gives you more room for error in exposure and editing, and lets you revisit older photos later as your skills improve. Most photo software can open RAW files, even beginner-friendly programs.
That said, RAW adds a second step to your workflow: you’ll need to process the files before sharing or printing. If that feels distracting or cumbersome right now, JPEG is perfectly reasonable while you focus on the fundamentals—exposure, focus, lighting, and composition. RAW won’t fix blurry, poorly composed, or uninteresting photos.
A practical compromise is RAW+JPEG for important or once-in-a-lifetime shots. Otherwise, choose the format that helps you shoot more and learn faster. If you want simplicity now, use JPEG. If you’re comfortable doing some processing and want maximum flexibility later, use RAW.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
As a beginner with an older computer, should I shoot RAW, JPEG, or RAW+JPEG?
What software can I use to edit Nikon D5100 RAW files, and what can RAW do better than JPEG?
Should you shoot RAW or JPEG for wedding photography?
Can a flatbed scanner save a photo as RAW for editing in Lightroom?
What’s the practical difference between Canon in-camera JPEGs and JPEGs exported from Lightroom from the same RAW file?