As a beginner with an older computer, should I shoot RAW, JPEG, or RAW+JPEG?
Asked 11/5/2012
2 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to DSLR photography and finding RAW processing difficult on my older computer. I have a Nikon D5100, Photoshop CS2 on Windows XP, and Nikon ViewNX2 is very slow for editing NEF files. For now I mainly want to take good photos, make small edits, and possibly print them. Should I just shoot Fine JPEG and edit those, or is it better to keep shooting RAW and convert to TIFF first? If possible, would RAW+JPEG be the best compromise for a beginner until I upgrade my computer and software?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
6
Since you say you are a beginner and getting discouraged by having to deal with the tool chain for processing raw images, I suggest you don't for now. There is lots to learn, and some things will have to come before some others. Focus on what is fun and interesting at this point. Getting used to exposure, shutter speed versus f-stop versus depth of field tradeoffs, and just getting used to how to operate your camera are much better things to delve into right now.
However, I suggest you capture and just save raw files for now along with the JPGs. I don't know what your camera can do, but mine has a setting to store a NEF and JPG file for each picture. If yours can do that too, then definitely set it up that way. Ignore the NEF file for now except to archive it along with the JPG. Some time in the future you will be ready and interested in post-processing, and then the NEF files from your old pictures will be there. At the least you can experiment on them, but maybe there will be a few pictures you really like by that time, and you'll be glad you can go back to the "original" and make the final derived version with the tradeoffs you want, not what the camera picked for you.
Originally by user7603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user7603
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For your situation, JPEG is the easiest way to start. As a beginner, it’s more important to focus on exposure, shutter speed, aperture, depth of field, and learning your camera than to get stuck fighting a slow RAW workflow.
If your camera supports it, the best compromise is RAW+JPEG. Use the JPEGs now for quick viewing, simple edits, and prints, and keep the RAW files archived for later when you have better software or a faster computer. That gives you immediate convenience without losing the original data.
If RAW+JPEG feels too cumbersome, shooting Fine JPEG alone is perfectly reasonable for now. Converting RAW to TIFF first usually just adds extra steps and large files, which probably won’t make things more enjoyable on your current system.
So: prioritize having fun and learning photography. Shoot JPEG, or better yet RAW+JPEG if your camera allows it, and revisit RAW editing later.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why do photos look brighter on my Nikon D3200 LCD than on my computer?
Why does my NEF-to-TIFF conversion look different from the camera JPEG, and how can I make it closer?
How much does Nikon’s lossy-compressed 14-bit NEF affect real-world image quality vs JPEG?
How can I open Sony RX100 RAW files in Photoshop CS2 on Mac OS X 10.6?
Why does my Nikon D5100 import two JPEGs instead of a RAW (.NEF) and JPEG when shooting RAW+JPEG?