Is the Yashica 300 Autofocus SLR a good film camera to use today?
Asked 8/9/2010
7 views
2 answers
0
I inherited a Yashica 300 Autofocus SLR from the early 1990s and I’m trying to find out whether it’s a worthwhile film camera to shoot with today. I’m interested in general impressions of its build, autofocus, metering, and usability, especially from anyone who has owned one. Are there any notable strengths or weaknesses, and does it suit any particular type of photography?
Originally by Ruepen. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Ruepen
16y ago
2 Answers
3
There was apparently a page of information on this camera at:
http://www.cdegroot.com/cgi-bin/photowiki/Yashica_AF300
but unfortunately currently (January 2011), that gives a 404 Error and the main page at cdegroot.com says the site is "temporarily" down. Having a lot of experience with "temporarily" down sites, I'm not terribly optimistic. However, a copy can be found at archive.org . (Thanks @whuber for encouraging me to look again!)
Another tidbit which might be useful for you — lenses for this thing look to be quite cheap.
Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1943
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The Yashica 300 Autofocus appears to be a capable consumer film SLR for its era rather than a particularly specialized camera. From user experience shared here, it was well made, durable, and offered useful features such as auto metering and autofocus with manual override. Autofocus was said to be reasonably fast in good light, but less reliable at night even with its infrared assist, and its centered autofocus behavior could be limiting.
Like most film SLRs, it isn’t inherently better for black-and-white than color; that depends more on the film you load and the lens you use than on the body itself. Its suitability for portraits, landscapes, or general photography will mostly come down to the lens mounted on it.
A practical advantage today is that lenses for the system appear to be inexpensive. If the camera works properly, it should be a perfectly usable entry into 35mm film photography. The simplest advice is to test it with a roll of film and judge from the results, since condition matters more than old reviews for a camera of this age.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI16y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What kind of camera prints photos immediately, and what are its pros and cons?
Are Minolta Maxxum AF lenses compatible with Sony Alpha cameras?
Which budget 35mm film SLR system still makes sense to buy?
Are late-model film SLRs better than older ones, and will they work with my Nikon gear?
Which is better overall: Nikon D300 or Nikon D3100?